Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup coverage reporting on codecov.io #411

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

BrianJKoopman
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR sets up code coverage reporting on codecov.io. Before merging it might even remove coverage reporting to coveralls.

Motivation and Context

We've been using coveralls.io for a while now, but I often find the coverage reports are extremely slow to navigate, taking 10's of seconds or longer to expand directories/load source files. I'd like to migrate away to codecov.io for this reason alone, but codecov has some additional nice features that I find appealing. codecov is also used by several other repos in our organization.

How Has This Been Tested?

I've migrated sorunlib to codecov already, so this is based on that.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Repository infrastructure change

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@BrianJKoopman
Copy link
Member Author

For reports to start working this needs to be merged. Replacement of coveralls will come in a follow-up PR.

@BrianJKoopman BrianJKoopman merged commit f2f90aa into main Oct 21, 2024
4 checks passed
@BrianJKoopman BrianJKoopman deleted the koopman/codecov-setup branch October 21, 2024 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant