Skip to content

Conversation

@icecrasher321
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Doesn't say error processing request even though it succeeds for MS teams Webhook.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • All tests pass locally and in CI (bun run test)
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have updated version numbers as needed (if needed)
  • I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms outlined in the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

Security Considerations:

  • My changes do not introduce any new security vulnerabilities
  • I have considered the security implications of my changes

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sim ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 21, 2025 7:26pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ⬜️ Skipped (Inspect) Jul 21, 2025 7:26pm

@delve-auditor
Copy link

delve-auditor bot commented Jul 21, 2025

No security or compliance issues detected. Reviewed everything up to 8078fb4.

Security Overview
  • 🔎 Scanned files: 1 changed file(s)
Detected Code Changes
Change Type Relevant files
Bug Fix ► utils.ts
    Add type field to Microsoft Teams webhook response format

Reply to this PR with @delve-auditor followed by a description of what change you want and we'll auto-submit a change to this PR to implement it.

@icecrasher321 icecrasher321 merged commit e4fbb67 into staging Jul 21, 2025
6 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes a bug in Microsoft Teams webhook handling where successful webhook executions were incorrectly showing error messages. The changes implement proper response formatting and HMAC signature validation across multiple components:

  1. Added a new MicrosoftTeamsConfig component with a dedicated UI for Teams webhook configuration
  2. Implemented HMAC signature validation in the webhook trigger route
  3. Added Teams-specific response formatting in the webhook utils
  4. Updated the webhook test API to properly handle Teams webhook testing

The changes follow established patterns in the codebase for webhook providers while adding Teams-specific security requirements and response formats.

Confidence score: 4/5

  1. This PR is safe to merge with standard review attention
  2. The changes are well-structured and include proper security measures, but the complexity of webhook handling warrants careful testing
  3. Files needing attention:
    • apps/sim/app/api/webhooks/trigger/[path]/route.ts - Verify HMAC validation logic
    • apps/sim/lib/webhooks/utils.ts - Check Teams-specific response formatting

5 files reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants