Bug fix: Removing check not allowing spell check on web

[joeserhtf]

Description

Fix: Enable spell check for Web.

For some reason, this call was locked for web builds.
Removing this lock, and running multiple tests without problems.
Using the spell check package adds a lot to the size, but it's not a problem.

Related Issues

Found: #2164

Type of Change

• ✨ New feature: Adds new functionality without breaking existing features.
• [ X ] 🛠️ Bug fix: Resolves an issue without altering current behavior.
• 🧹 Code refactor: Code restructuring that does not affect behavior.
• ❌ Breaking change: Alters existing functionality and requires updates.
• 🧪 Tests: Adds new tests or modifies existing tests.
• 📝 Documentation: Updates or additions to documentation.
• 🗑️ Chore: Routine tasks, or maintenance.
• ✅ Build configuration change: Changes to build or deploy processes.

[EchoEllet]

Thank you for your contributions. If you do plan on using Spell Checker in your own app, please take a look at #2246 first. We do plan on breaking the SpellCheckerService completely soon to fix some issues. Which is the main reason I moved it into the example instead of own package. It will be experimental even after those changes.

@singerdmx I will review this change soon.

@CatHood0 Is this a reason for this check, or maybe it's for preventing an issue for the web?

[CatHood0]

@CatHood0 Is this a reason for this check or maybe it's for preventing an issue for the web?

Was this why it didn't work? I understand it now. Believe me, I completely forgot that I added that condition which, now that I see it, did nothing. Thanks for that quick fix. I already thought it would be something else.

And to answer you, no, I really doubt it did anything, and I don't think I remember why I added it.

[CatHood0]

Thanks for reviewing the code and fixing it. I didn't remember (even when I reviewed it I didn't notice this for some reason) that I added such a condition.

[stvhrs]

thanks bro