Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[python] Fix search in readthedocs #3573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

johnkerl
Copy link
Member

@johnkerl johnkerl commented Jan 16, 2025

Issue and/or context: #3561

Changes: Found by googling. Tested in sandbox using doc/sandbox*.sh as noted there.

Notes for Reviewer:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.22%. Comparing base (270b222) to head (8c7ac07).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3573   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.22%   86.22%           
=======================================
  Files          55       55           
  Lines        6410     6410           
=======================================
  Hits         5527     5527           
  Misses        883      883           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 86.22% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
python_api 86.22% <ø> (ø)
libtiledbsoma ∅ <ø> (∅)

@johnkerl johnkerl merged commit 14947ad into main Jan 16, 2025
17 checks passed
@johnkerl johnkerl deleted the kerl/fix-readthedocs-search branch January 16, 2025 20:08
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
johnkerl added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
Co-authored-by: John Kerl <kerl.john.r@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants