You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Agent Oraclization, or the ability to allow third party smart contract to use SingularityNET services (hosted offchain) as oracles, requires changes in the platform-contracts (singnet/platform-contracts/issues/28) as well as changes in the daemon itself to become an Oracle.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Am curious... does "Oracle" have a specific meaning in the blockchain world? Or is it our own definition for exposing SNet services to external smart contracts?
The blockchains in general have limited or zero external transport capabilities, resulting in tiny surface of attack wich is good, but also no way to gather data from outside. The concept of oracle can be trustful (such as just an API of third party). The problem is that if the API changes or disappear, the smart contract will not behave in a deterministic way for the same input. Some provably honest solution are out there, for example take a look at oraclize.it
Agent Oraclization, or the ability to allow third party smart contract to use SingularityNET services (hosted offchain) as oracles, requires changes in the platform-contracts (singnet/platform-contracts/issues/28) as well as changes in the daemon itself to become an Oracle.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: