Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1243: build: Ensure no optimization when…
… building for coverage analysis 8e79c7e build: Ensure no optimization when building for coverage analysis (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: bitcoin#944 introduced a regression when building for coverage analysis. The `-O2` flag from the default Autoconf's `CFLAGS` overrides the coverage-specific `-O0` one, which makes coverage analysis results [less reliable](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov-and-Optimization.html). This PR restores the pre-bitcoin#944 behaviour. In contrast to an alternative smaller diff: ```diff --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ fi if test x"$enable_coverage" = x"yes"; then SECP_CONFIG_DEFINES="$SECP_CONFIG_DEFINES -DCOVERAGE=1" - SECP_CFLAGS="-O0 --coverage $SECP_CFLAGS" + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O0 --coverage " LDFLAGS="--coverage $LDFLAGS" else # Most likely the CFLAGS already contain -O2 because that is autoconf's default. ``` this PR ensures that the user always has the last word. FWIW, Bitcoin Core uses a similar [approach](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/460e394625fab2942748aaeec9be31f460f91c58/configure.ac#L879-L884). ACKs for top commit: jonasnick: tested ACK 8e79c7e real-or-random: utACK 8e79c7e Tree-SHA512: f04b55921d397bd7c003ec0283101d3908f3fb507789c855e1b6d5abd150e7d6281d5eeb8fefbb7d6a55b3c6f29a19324f570eee009794f8fa9bca956229e7ce
- Loading branch information