Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/skale 779 full sync node #428

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
May 31, 2022
Merged

Conversation

dmytrotkk
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

cstrangedk and others added 24 commits September 10, 2021 18:05
…te-fs-version

SKALE-4340 Update fs version
…precompiled

SKALE-4681 Add RNG precompiled, update skaled version
Sync with testnet. Upgrade versions to latest
…issions-for-precompields

SKALE-4829 Add permissions system for precompileds
…issions-for-precompields

SKALE-4829 Remove print fake eth contract
…ract

SKALE-4905 Add getIMABLSPublicKey precompield contract
@dmytrotkk dmytrotkk self-assigned this May 12, 2022
@dmytrotkk dmytrotkk requested a review from kladkogex as a code owner May 12, 2022 18:59
- ${SKALE_DIR}:/skale_vol
- ${SKALE_DIR}/node_data:/skale_node_data
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD", "python3", "healthchecks/admin.py"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably it won't work

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this health check verifies that container prints something in logs at least once in 600 seconds, so it should still work with sync node

@dmytrotkk dmytrotkk requested a review from badrogger May 19, 2022 21:36
@dmytrotkk dmytrotkk merged commit e0f4e00 into sync-node May 31, 2022
@dmytrotkk dmytrotkk deleted the feature/SKALE-779-full-sync-node branch May 31, 2022 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants