Skip to content

Conversation

@MStreet3
Copy link
Contributor

Requires

Supports

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 MStreet3, thanks for creating this pull request!

To help reviewers, please consider creating future PRs as drafts first. This allows you to self-review and make any final changes before notifying the team.

Once you're ready, you can mark it as "Ready for review" to request feedback. Thanks!


if len(c.responseIDCount) > 1 {
lggr.Warn("received multiple different responses for the same request, number of different responses received: %d", len(c.responseIDCount))
lggr.Warnw("received multiple unique responses for the same request", "count for responseID", len(c.responseIDCount))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log already has responseID via With

@MStreet3 MStreet3 requested review from a team as code owners October 27, 2025 14:16
}

// TransmissionConfig has to be set only for V2 capabilities. V1 capabilities read transmission schedule from every request.
func NewClientExecuteRequest(ctx context.Context, lggr logger.Logger, req commoncap.CapabilityRequest,
Copy link
Contributor

@krehermann krehermann Oct 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why?

, 
)

seem must less legible than )

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

autocorrect by gofumpt

@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

Quality Gate failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
7.41% Technical Debt Ratio on New Code (required ≤ 4%)
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube IDE SonarQube IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants