Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SDL 0293] Enable OEM exclusive apps support #37

Closed
AKalinich-Luxoft opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

[SDL 0293] Enable OEM exclusive apps support #37

AKalinich-Luxoft opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@AKalinich-Luxoft
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal: Enable OEM exclusive apps support

This feature will enable SDL adopters to provide exclusive apps to their users depending on vehicle type. The proposal describes a way to share vehicle type information before sending the Register App Interface request.

Review: smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution#971

Steering Committee Decision:
The Steering Committee voted to accept this proposal with the following revisions:

The author is to update the proposal to include the requested requirement for the Java Suite Library to have two pull requests submitted for this feature. The reasoning as to why is documented in this comment and should be included in the proposal.

The proposal .md file was updated to reflect these revisions on 12/14/2020.

@AKalinich-Luxoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jordynmackool please notice that GitHub issue for SDL-0293 is required for current repository because it is listed in "Impacted Platforms" section. This issue was created to link our changes introduced in #36
Feel free to update this issue and add all required labels here if necessary.

@jordynmackool
Copy link

The proposal markdown file has been updated per the revisions included in the accepted with revisions review issue: SDL 0293 Revisions - Enable OEM exclusive apps support.

Accepted revisions can be reviewed in the merged PR here: smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution#1106.

@jordynmackool
Copy link

closed via #36

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants