Multiple media and navigation apps activation during active embedded navigation+audio mixing supported

[GetmanetsIrina]

Occurrence: Always

Description

Multiple media and navigation apps activation during active embedded navigation+audio mixing supported

Preconditions

• "MixingAudioSupported" = true at .ini file
• SDL and HMI are started.
• Three apps running on system:
  a. media app_1 in FULL and AUDIBLE
  b. navigation app_2 in LIMITED and AUDIBLE
  c. non-media app_3 in BACKGROUND and NOT_AUDIBLE
• User activates embedded navigation and HMILevel of apps were changed to:
  a. media app_1 in LIMITED and AUDIBLE
  b. navigation app_2 in BACKGROUND and NOT_AUDIBLE

Steps to reproduce

1. User activates media app_1
   HMI -> SDL: SDL.ActivateApp ( <appID_1> )
   SDL -> HMI: SDL.ActivateApp (SUCCESS)
2. SDL -> media app_1: OnHMIStatus (FULL, AUDIBLE)
   Note: embedded navigation is still active
3. User activates navigation app_2
   HMI -> SDL: OnEventChanged (EMBEDDED_NAVI, isActive:false)
   HMI -> SDL: OnAppDeactivated ( <appID_1> )
   HMI -> SDL: SDL.ActivateApp ( <appID_2 )

Actual result

SDL does not set required HMILevel and audioStreamingState.

Expected result

1. SDL -> media app_1 : OnHMIStatus (LIMITED, AUDIBLE)
2. SDL -> HMI: SDL.ActivateApp (SUCCESS)
3. SDL -> navigation app_2 : OnHMIStatus (FULL, AUDIBLE)

Environment

Attachments

Expected delivery

• Source code updates
• Code comments
• UTs add/update (not required)
• ATF tests add/update
• Manual tests (not required)
• Add/update CI plans/jobs (not required)
• SDD updates (not required)
• Guidelines update (sdl_core_guides) (not required)
• Guidelines update (sdl_hmi_integration_guidelines) (not required)

[dboltovskyi]

Priority was set to Medium. Issue is related to setting wrong HMI level and/or audioStreamingState for activated application in some specific cases. May affect correct permissions calculation for media activated application.

[E-SAITO-TMC]

@theresalech -san, We were able to reproduce this issue with Core 6.0.1. This is a high priority issue for Toyota. Could you please include this in the Core 6.2 release planning?

[theresalech]

@GetmanetsIrina can you please advise if you are able to reproduce this issue in the latest Core release?

[dboltovskyi]

@theresalech Please notice issue is still actual for Core 6.1
ATF script and logs: 2020-06-02_20-53-27_1920.tar.gz

[theresalech]

Hi @dboltovskyi, thank you for the additional information. Will Luxoft be submitting a PR to resolve this issue?

[dboltovskyi]

@theresalech Please notice we're not planning to create the fix in scope of 6.2, though will try to do as much as possible

[jacobkeeler]

Closing with the merge of #3476