smarty should be PSR-0 compatible for autoloading

[ipranjal]

No description provided.

[atayahmet]

exactly.

[bigbigant]

Looking forward to that.

[Gemorroj]

👍

[hlohaus]

or PSR-4 👍

[ipranjal]

@hlohaus PSR-4 would also work !

[uwetews]

PSR-0 autoloading is deprecated. So we will look into PSR-4 compatibility.
This will require a change in folder structure and maybe the renaming of some classes.
I did put this on the TODO list for one of the next releases.

[ipranjal]

ok

[remicollet]

PSR-4 ? seriously ?
then don't forget to introduce nameapace with a "vendor" top level.

[SvenRtbg]

PSR-0 works for everything that does not use namespaces, but can be made to conform to a specific file layout.

PSR-4 requires namespaces. Smarty doesn't use namespaces. So PSR-4 isn't available.

Switching Smarty to namespaces will be an incompatible change, which should be released as a new major version, i.e. Smarty 4.

[lunika]

+1 with @SvenRtbg

[roadster31]

👍 @SvenRtbg

[ipranjal]

Thats why i suggested plain PSR-0

[uwetews]

I agree that PSR-0 looks for now to be the better solution. But this also requires changes in the folder structure and the renaming of some classes. This will create some backward compatibility issues.
For that reason it is not a good idea to implement it in 3.1.

I have done it in my local 3.2 version.
I expect to provide an alpha release of 3.2 within the next 2 month.

[pm-j]

Hi,
I have tried to implement psr in smarty but it seems not to work even if I have no error in my log.
Have you a psr compatible version released ?
Thanks

[SvenRtbg]

@pm-j Smarty provides it's own autoloader in addition to the Composer definition. Have you considered using it?

[caucik]

@uwetews What is the current target date for 3.2 with namespaces?

[SvenRtbg]

Smarty 3.2 cannot have namespaces because that would be an incompatible change.

[ipranjal]

Any updates on getting into PSR-4 ?

[AnrDaemon]

PSR-4 requires namespacing, this is best left to Smarty 3.2.

[ipranjal]

3yrs down the line , any update on this ?

[troy-rudolph]

The autoloading used with Smarty causes troubles with AspectMock. Could you please conform to PSR-0 for now, and then do PSR-4 in a major release? Thank you for all the hard work.

[AnrDaemon]

If AspectMock have issues with standard autoloading schemes, raise it with that AspectMock thing.

[troy-rudolph]

It does not appear to me that Smarty uses standard autoloading. If I am wrong, please correct me. But, I can think of three nonstandard things right now.

[AnrDaemon]

It does, since December 2018.

[matiasperrone]

Shouldn't be this issue closed?

[ipranjal]

Old issue- waiting for PSR 4 support