Make aws.api#unsignedPayload trait an annotation trait #232
Labels
breaking-change
This issue requires a breaking change to remediate.
Comments
mtdowling
added
the
breaking-change
mtdowling
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 28, 2020
The aws.api#unsignedPayload trait currently takes a set of signing names to enable unsigned payloads on. However, I don't think we will ever need this level of granularity and it makes it more difficult to implement codegen. Closes #232
mtdowling
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2020
The aws.api#unsignedPayload trait currently takes a set of signing names to enable unsigned payloads on. However, I don't think we will ever need this level of granularity and it makes it more difficult to implement codegen. Closes #232
JordonPhillips
pushed a commit
to JordonPhillips/smithy
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2020
The aws.api#unsignedPayload trait currently takes a set of signing names to enable unsigned payloads on. However, I don't think we will ever need this level of granularity and it makes it more difficult to implement codegen. Closes smithy-lang#232
mtdowling
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2020
The aws.api#unsignedPayload trait currently takes a set of signing names to enable unsigned payloads on. However, I don't think we will ever need this level of granularity and it makes it more difficult to implement codegen. Closes #232
JordonPhillips
pushed a commit
to JordonPhillips/smithy
that referenced
this issue
Apr 22, 2020
The aws.api#unsignedPayload trait currently takes a set of signing names to enable unsigned payloads on. However, I don't think we will ever need this level of granularity and it makes it more difficult to implement codegen. Closes smithy-lang#232
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The
aws.api#unsignedPayloadtrait currently takes a set of signing names to enable unsigned payloads on. However, I don't think we will ever need this level of granularity and it makes it more difficult to implement codegen.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: