UVTools Exposure Finder strange behaviour at Chitu E10 8K FirmWare 1.0.0 - 1.0.7

[vadimav1]

I have a Chitu E10 8K FirmWare 1.0.0 - 1.0.7 printer.
I wish to make 16 tests which must print simultaneously (together), with exposure from 0.5 to 8 sec.
I used UVTools Exposure Finder.
I multiplyed standart UVTools test pattern 16 times and generate a simply short test with growing exposure time from 05 to 8sec.
I use printer without table, watching process for control at it's screen and measure Z heiht.
But printer aborted test and show an error "print error and button 'Shure' ".
Printer stopped to show errors when i use lift height >=1mm. (mark 2 at Fig. below)
With such bigger value printer worked without showing errors at a touch screen.
But print process looks like strange.
Lighting of Every of 16 elements leads to table shift at value of entered layer thickness = 0.1mm (mark 1), so as a result whole big layer thickness appeared as 16*layer thickness =1.6mm.

Question: Is it printer work correcly , or i do not understand some things in this test adjustments?
Seems that i must type 16 times smaller value to a layer window, waiting stepwise-like placement of 16 elements, but how to be with base layers, they would become too thin?

[sn4k3]

Some users is getting problem with some printers, unable to generate multiple exposure tests with new format of CTB Encrypted.
Like Mighty 8K and Sonic Mini 8K are getting same problem that I'm unable to know why without a proper printer to test.

Others:

• https://www.facebook.com/groups/uvtools/posts/817615086014663/
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/uvtools/posts/795122058263966/
• https://www.reddit.com/r/Phrozen/comments/z01qc0/mighty_8k_seems_stuck_at_first_layer_with_uvtools/

[sn4k3]

All Anycubic use it own board and firmware. The firmware is very bad and not compatible with multi exposure UVtools test nor some other utilities. In general avoid anycubic until they make something usable.

[vadimav1]

Are You saying that MB Chitu is less worst thing than MB AnyCubik, although all this MBs- continue to be the wostest in terms of opennes and functionality? May be uptodate NanoDLP can work with 8k? What means one can apply with less blood to get G-Code 8K printer?

[sn4k3]

Yes, Chitu have the more capable MB right now for 8K printers. Anycubic are bad if you want to use exotic approach or simply the AA.
If you are regular user that only wants to print out of slicer without any other tune or strategies then it won't matter.
I'm afraid ATM the chitu is the only option for 8K.
You have gcode printers only in 4K ATM.

"Soon" We will have the OpenMSLA board which will be open and give all the features we need. Chitu and others insists in not listen to community and do as they want. The creation of a new fileformat to fit all our needs cost nothing and is easy to do, still they don't care.

Btw have you tried the timelapse tool test?

[vadimav1]

I agree. Simply ZIP with enumerated PNGs and + one text file with G-Code (I believe, that OpenMSLA will have the same format. It's very convenient) is optimal for all, as beginning users, as printing deers, as well as for professors and scientific work. Probably, Chitu is trying to stop any user's creative investigation work.
For example, using simply exposure finder, one can find proper exposure during one 30min printer session. Now, with chitu i must print the same object 30 times separately with a lot of washing, filtering, ...etc. and it will take about a day itself!

[sn4k3]

Yes, they are making SLA very hard which is a non-sense, FDM is miles ahead.