removed storage of vote data #355
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bonustrack
reviewed
Sep 29, 2022
| voter_address: Address, proposal_id: felt | ||
| ) -> (vote: Vote) { | ||
| return Voting.get_vote_info(voter_address, proposal_id); | ||
| func has_voted{syscall_ptr: felt*, pedersen_ptr: HashBuiltin*, range_check_ptr: felt}( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why we have has_voted function twice? Couldnt we reuse the same function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One is external, the other is not. This is to follow OZ's pattern :)
Basically the logic is in a lib file with its namespace: and when you want to write external functions it's mostly wrappers around this lib. It's done to avoid namespace / storage clashing ;)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #353