-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
add github templates and update namespace and group of this project #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add github templates and update namespace and group of this project #1
Conversation
Signed-off-by: NeatGuyCoding <15627489+NeatGuyCoding@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughAdds standardized GitHub issue and pull request templates with configuration, reorganizes contribution guidelines for clarity, updates README to reflect active maintenance, and migrates project metadata to the new GitHub organization (socketio4j). Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the project's GitHub organization namespace from NeatGuyCoding to socketio4j and adds standardized GitHub templates for issues and pull requests.
- Updated repository URLs in
pom.xml,README.md, andCONTRIBUTING.mdto reflect the newsocketio4jorganization - Simplified and streamlined the
CONTRIBUTING.mddocumentation - Added GitHub issue templates for bug reports and feature requests, along with a PR template
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| pom.xml | Updated SCM URLs from NeatGuyCoding to socketio4j organization |
| README.md | Updated project description and removed outdated branching information |
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Streamlined contribution guidelines, updated upstream remote URL to socketio4j, and simplified documentation structure |
| .github/pull_request_template.md | Added standardized PR template with checklist and structured sections |
| .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md | Added feature request template with consistent formatting |
| .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml | Added issue template configuration linking to discussions |
| .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md | Added bug report template with environment details and structured sections |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
7-7: Minor wording suggestion for Type of Change options.The phrasing "Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)" could be slightly improved for formality. Consider: "Bug fix (non-breaking change that resolves an issue)" or "Bug fix (non-breaking change to resolve an issue)" for more formal wording.
Also applies to: 7-7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md(1 hunks).github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml(1 hunks).github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md(1 hunks).github/pull_request_template.md(1 hunks)CONTRIBUTING.md(5 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)pom.xml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/pull_request_template.md
[style] ~7-~7: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ... [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaki...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
README.md (2)
3-3: Active fork narrative is clear and informative.The update effectively communicates the project's active maintenance status, replacing the previous "no longer actively maintained" statement. This aligns well with the project reorganization under the socketio4j organization.
Also applies to: 3-3
13-39: Migration section is well-structured with clear dependency replacement examples.The before/after Maven dependency examples make it straightforward for users upgrading from the original netty-socketio. The note about Spring integration using
SpringAnnotationScanneris helpful context.pom.xml (1)
11-11: Project URLs consistently updated to socketio4j organization.All three URL references (project URL and SCM URLs) correctly point to the new organization namespace. This ensures proper attribution and links in Maven Central and related tools.
Also applies to: 11-11
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
1-44: PR template provides clear structure and helpful guidance.The template appropriately aligns with the contribution guidelines defined in CONTRIBUTING.md, including type categories, testing requirements, and commit message conventions. The checklist effectively encourages contributors to verify quality standards before submission.
CONTRIBUTING.md (2)
87-87: Previous review feedback on JUnit documentation has been properly addressed.The Testing section now correctly documents that "JUnit 5 for new tests. JUnit 4 is also supported for legacy tests (both are available via Maven dependencies)." This accurately reflects the dual JUnit support evident in pom.xml.
Also applies to: 87-87
26-42: Quick Start section properly references socketio4j organization.The git commands correctly point to the new organization namespace for both the fork clone and the upstream remote. This aligns with the project rebranding in this PR.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml (1)
1-6: Issue template configuration enforces structured submissions appropriately.Disabling blank issues and providing a discussion link ensures that substantive questions go to Discussions while structured bug reports and feature requests use the provided templates. The socketio4j organization URL is correctly referenced.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1)
1-48: Bug report template provides comprehensive structure for issue submission.The template effectively guides users to provide essential debugging information: reproduction steps, environment details, code examples, and stack traces. The module selector appropriately constrains to the integration modules where framework-specific issues typically arise. Title prefix and label assignment will help with organization and filtering.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md (1)
1-33: Feature request template encourages thorough problem analysis and design consideration.The progression from motivation (use case) through design (proposed solution and alternatives) to impact assessment (module, breaking changes, compatibility) creates a thoughtful submission process. This helps distinguish from premature requests and surfaces important considerations early.
Summary by CodeRabbit