Correctly pass through flags rb_process_status_wait.
#81
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ioquatix
force-pushed
the
rb_process_status_wait
branch
from
819494b to
44e78a8
Compare
ioquatix
force-pushed
the
rb_process_status_wait
branch
from
44e78a8 to
07696b6
Compare
|
See ruby/ruby#8316 for more context. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
rb_process_status_waitis not exposed yet in CRuby, but when/if it is, it will take a flags argument.WNOHANGshould always be set, as it's used to (efficiently) by-pass the fiber scheduler.Types of Changes
Contribution