You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in #3903, the renaming of RestShapeSpringFF was raised. The discussion widened to all SOFA constraints and we agreed on this new naming convention:
Here would be my suggested nomenclature:
projective constraints ➡️ XXXProjectiveConstraint even if it repeats the package name
(e.g. FixedProjectiveConstraint)
weak force constraints ➡️ XXXPenalityForceField
Lagrange-based constraints ➡️ XXXLagrangianConstraint (to keep the current C++ class names)
e.g. A code was the purpose of the RestShapeSpringsForceField would become ShapePenalityForceField.
Any feedback is more than welcome 👥
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As discussed in #3903, the renaming of RestShapeSpringFF was raised. The discussion widened to all SOFA constraints and we agreed on this new naming convention:
Here would be my suggested nomenclature:
XXXProjectiveConstraint
even if it repeats the package name(e.g. FixedProjectiveConstraint)
XXXPenalityForceField
XXXLagrangianConstraint
(to keep the current C++ class names)e.g. A code was the purpose of the
RestShapeSpringsForceField
would becomeShapePenalityForceField
.Any feedback is more than welcome 👥
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: