Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differentiated configuration for RocksDB #907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2022

Conversation

qiujiayu
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation:

#903

Modification:

Describe the idea and modifications you've done.

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

@killme2008
Copy link
Contributor

killme2008 commented Nov 28, 2022

Good job. But looks like it makes a breaking API change. Can we still reserve the functionsregisterXXXX(final Class<?> cls, final XXXOptions opts)? Make them configure all raft groups' storage options by default.

@qiujiayu qiujiayu force-pushed the issue_903 branch 2 times, most recently from fe235b2 to cad7fb3 Compare December 2, 2022 15:45
@qiujiayu
Copy link
Contributor Author

qiujiayu commented Dec 3, 2022

Good job. But looks like it makes a breaking API change. Can we still reserve the functionsregisterXXXX(final Class<?> cls, final XXXOptions opts)? Make them configure all raft groups' storage options by default.

done

Copy link
Contributor

@killme2008 killme2008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. But prefer to rename the property name. Ping @fengjiachun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants