-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: remove wrong verify logic #1433
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve simplifying the initialization of mock objects in the test classes Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Class
participant Mock as Mock Object
participant System as System Under Test
Test->>Mock: Initialize mocks using Mockito.mock()
Mock-->>Test: Provide expected behavior for tests
Test->>System: Execute tests with mocks
System-->>Test: Return results for verification
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyBatchWriteQueueTest.java (2 hunks)
- remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyChannelTest.java (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyBatchWriteQueueTest.java
Additional comments not posted (2)
remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyChannelTest.java (2)
75-76
: Clarify the reason for commenting out verification logic.Commenting out the verification logic can affect the robustness of the tests. Please clarify the reason behind this change.
56-56
: LGTM! Verify the usage ofnettyChannel
andmockWriteQueue
.The initialization changes are approved.
However, ensure that
nettyChannel
andmockWriteQueue
are correctly used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The usage of
nettyChannel
andmockWriteQueue
is correct.
- The
nettyChannel
is correctly initialized and used in theNettyChannelTest.java
file.- The
mockWriteQueue
is correctly set up and verified using Mockito.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `nettyChannel` and `mockWriteQueue` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `nettyChannel`. Expect: Correct usage of the initialized object. rg --type java -A 5 $'nettyChannel' # Test: Search for the usage of `mockWriteQueue`. Expect: Correct usage of the mock object. rg --type java -A 5 $'mockWriteQueue'Length of output: 8576
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Motivation:
Fix wrong
Mockito.verify
Summary by CodeRabbit
NettyBatchWriteQueueTest
andNettyChannelTest
by simplifying mock object initialization.NettyChannelTest
for improved test performance, while noting changes in verification logic.