Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove wrong verify logic #1433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Lo1nt
Copy link
Collaborator

@Lo1nt Lo1nt commented Aug 2, 2024

Motivation:

Fix wrong Mockito.verify

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced test clarity and reduced boilerplate in the NettyBatchWriteQueueTest and NettyChannelTest by simplifying mock object initialization.
    • Adjusted focus in NettyChannelTest for improved test performance, while noting changes in verification logic.

@sofastack-cla sofastack-cla bot added bug Something isn't working cla:yes CLA is ok size/S labels Aug 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve simplifying the initialization of mock objects in the test classes NettyBatchWriteQueueTest and NettyChannelTest by removing the @Mock annotations and directly instantiating mocks using Mockito.mock(). This reduces boilerplate code and enhances clarity in the tests. Additionally, some verification logic has been commented out in the NettyChannelTest, indicating a possible refocus of test objectives.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyBatchWriteQueueTest.java
remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyChannelTest.java
Removed @Mock annotations, replacing them with direct instantiation of mocks using Mockito.mock(). Simplified setup and reduced boilerplate code. Comments added to verification logic in NettyChannelTest.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Class
    participant Mock as Mock Object
    participant System as System Under Test

    Test->>Mock: Initialize mocks using Mockito.mock()
    Mock-->>Test: Provide expected behavior for tests
    Test->>System: Execute tests with mocks
    System-->>Test: Return results for verification
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the land of mocks and queues,
A simplification brings good news.
No more annotations to declare,
Just clean code floating in the air.
Tests run swiftly, clear and bright,
Hooray for changes, what a delight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff2471e and 164411e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyBatchWriteQueueTest.java (2 hunks)
  • remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyChannelTest.java (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyBatchWriteQueueTest.java
Additional comments not posted (2)
remoting/remoting-http/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/rpc/transport/netty/NettyChannelTest.java (2)

75-76: Clarify the reason for commenting out verification logic.

Commenting out the verification logic can affect the robustness of the tests. Please clarify the reason behind this change.


56-56: LGTM! Verify the usage of nettyChannel and mockWriteQueue.

The initialization changes are approved.

However, ensure that nettyChannel and mockWriteQueue are correctly used throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

The usage of nettyChannel and mockWriteQueue is correct.

  • The nettyChannel is correctly initialized and used in the NettyChannelTest.java file.
  • The mockWriteQueue is correctly set up and verified using Mockito.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `nettyChannel` and `mockWriteQueue` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `nettyChannel`. Expect: Correct usage of the initialized object.
rg --type java -A 5 $'nettyChannel'

# Test: Search for the usage of `mockWriteQueue`. Expect: Correct usage of the mock object.
rg --type java -A 5 $'mockWriteQueue'

Length of output: 8576

@Lo1nt Lo1nt requested a review from EvenLjj August 2, 2024 07:44
@Lo1nt Lo1nt requested a review from z2z23n0 August 2, 2024 07:48
Copy link
Member

@z2z23n0 z2z23n0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Lo1nt Lo1nt merged commit 2d8190f into sofastack:master Aug 2, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working cla:yes CLA is ok size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants