-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stake-pool: Add tolerance for stake accounts at minimum #3839
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9f67fd6
stake-pool: Add tolerance for stake accounts at minimum
joncinque 64b3073
Use test-case to check more cases
joncinque eb85e92
Add more tolerance on withdrawal
joncinque 06ccaef
Potentially fix test per #3854
joncinque 86fad44
Keep throwing solutions until CI passes
joncinque d13385f
Fix repeated transaction issue
joncinque 013fd51
Fix preferred withdrawal tolerance too
joncinque 779c926
Remove doubled tolerance
joncinque File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am curious, I think there is something I am missing here. We are comparing against the actual lamports in the stake account here, so a tolerance of +lamports_per_token should always be enough.
For example, let's assume we only reduce the stake account to minimum_stake_lamports + (lamports_per_token - 1). But then
split_from_lamports = minimum_stake_lamports +(lamports_per_token - 1)
already, and we can always find a token burn amount so that we are within +lamports_per_token of that. No need to double, as far as I understand.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, I just wrote the test poorly during my first pass. No need for the limit, thanks for taking the time to notice this!