Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A utility to estimate the compute unit consumption of a transaction message #2703

Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-cougars-try.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@solana/web3.js-experimental": patch
---

Created a utility function to estimate the compute unit consumption of a transaction message
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions packages/errors/src/codes.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ export const SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__INVALID_NONCE_TRANSACTION_FIRST_INSTRUCT
export const SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__ADDRESSES_CANNOT_SIGN_TRANSACTION = 5663015 as const;
export const SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__CANNOT_ENCODE_WITH_EMPTY_SIGNATURES = 5663016 as const;
export const SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__MESSAGE_SIGNATURES_MISMATCH = 5663017 as const;
export const SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_ESTIMATE_COMPUTE_LIMIT = 5663018 as const;

// Transaction errors.
// Reserve error codes starting with [7050000-7050999] for the Rust enum `TransactionError`.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -484,6 +485,7 @@ export type SolanaErrorCode =
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_ADDRESS_LOOKUP_TABLE_INDEX_OUT_OF_RANGE
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_FEE_PAYER_MISSING
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_INSTRUCTION_PROGRAM_ADDRESS_NOT_FOUND
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_ESTIMATE_COMPUTE_LIMIT
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FEE_PAYER_MISSING
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FEE_PAYER_SIGNATURE_MISSING
| typeof SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__INVALID_NONCE_TRANSACTION_FIRST_INSTRUCTION_MUST_BE_ADVANCE_NONCE
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions packages/errors/src/messages.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ import {
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_ADDRESS_LOOKUP_TABLE_INDEX_OUT_OF_RANGE,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_FEE_PAYER_MISSING,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_INSTRUCTION_PROGRAM_ADDRESS_NOT_FOUND,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_ESTIMATE_COMPUTE_LIMIT,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FEE_PAYER_MISSING,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FEE_PAYER_SIGNATURE_MISSING,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__INVALID_NONCE_TRANSACTION_FIRST_INSTRUCTION_MUST_BE_ADVANCE_NONCE,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -570,6 +571,10 @@ export const SolanaErrorMessages: Readonly<{
[SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_FEE_PAYER_MISSING]: 'No fee payer set in CompiledTransaction',
[SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_DECOMPILE_INSTRUCTION_PROGRAM_ADDRESS_NOT_FOUND]:
'Could not find program address at index $index',
[SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_ESTIMATE_COMPUTE_LIMIT]:
'Failed to estimate the compute unit consumption for this transaction message. This is ' +
'likely because simulating the transaction failed. Inspect the `cause` property of this ' +
'error to learn more',
[SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FEE_PAYER_MISSING]: 'Transaction is missing a fee payer.',
[SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FEE_PAYER_SIGNATURE_MISSING]:
"Could not determine this transaction's signature. Make sure that the transaction has " +
Expand Down
40 changes: 40 additions & 0 deletions packages/library/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -880,6 +880,46 @@ const signedTransaction = await signTransaction([signer], transactionMessageWith
// => "Property 'lifetimeConstraint' is missing in type"
```

### Calibrating A Transaction Message's Compute Unit Budget

Correctly budgeting a compute unit limit for your transaction message can increase the probabilty that your transaction will be accepted for processing. If you don't declare a compute unit limit on your transaction, validators will assume an upper limit of 200K compute units (CU) per instruction.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

…validators will assume an upper limit of 200K compute units (CU) per instruction.

I didn't look this up. Is this true?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We looked into this a bit when we were looking at priority fees a while back. It's accurate, 200k per instruction (excluding those to compute budget program) with a 1.4M cap (which is the max CU allowed per transaction): https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/4293f11cf13fc1e83f1baa2ca3bb2f8ea8f9a000/program-runtime/src/compute_budget.rs#L13


Since validators have an incentive to pack as many transactions into each block as possible, they may choose to include transactions that they know will fit into the remaining compute budget for the current block over transactions that might not. For this reason, you should set a compute unit limit on each of your transaction messages, whenever possible.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc/ @joncinque to check over.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep this is correct! It could even be more forceful, since validators will skip transactions that might go over the block limit in the default implementation.

For example, if there are 599k CUs left in the block, and the transaction has 3 top-level instructions, the validator gives it the default limit of 600k CUs, and will immediately skip it.


Use this utility to estimate the actual compute unit cost of a given transaction message.

```ts
import { getSetComputeLimitInstruction } from '@solana-program/compute-budget';
import { createSolanaRpc, getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessageFactory, pipe } from '@solana/web3.js';

// Create an estimator function.
const rpc = createSolanaRpc('http://127.0.0.1:8899');
const getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage = getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessageFactory({
rpc,
});

// Create your transaction message.
const transactionMessage = pipe(
createTransactionMessage({ version: 'legacy' }),
/* ... */
);

// Request an estimate of the actual compute units this message will consume.
const computeUnitsEstimate = await getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage(transactionMessage);

// Set the transaction message's compute unit budget.
const transactionMessageWithComputeUnitLimit = prependTransactionMessageInstruction(
getSetComputeLimitInstruction({ units: computeUnitsEstimate }),
transactionMessage,
);
```

> [!WARNING]
> The compute unit estimate is just that &ndash; an estimate. The compute unit consumption of the actual transaction might be higher or lower than what was observed in simulation. Unless you are confident that your particular transaction message will consume the same or fewer compute units as was estimated, you might like to augment the estimate by either a fixed number of CUs or a multiplier.

> [!NOTE]
> If you are preparing an _unsigned_ transaction, destined to be signed and submitted to the network by a wallet, you might like to leave it up to the wallet to determine the compute unit limit. Consider that the wallet might have a more global view of how many compute units certain types of transactions consume, and might be able to make better estimates of an appropriate compute unit budget.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on this, @jordaaash?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to tag wallet folks.


### Helpers For Building Transaction Messages

Building transaction messages in this manner might feel different from what you’re used to. Also, we certainly wouldn’t want you to have to bind transformed transaction messages to a new variable at each step, so we have released a functional programming library dubbed `@solana/functional` that lets you build transaction messages in **pipelines**. Here’s how it can be used:
Expand Down
261 changes: 261 additions & 0 deletions packages/library/src/__tests__/compute-limit-internal-test.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
import { Address } from '@solana/addresses';
import {
SOLANA_ERROR__INSTRUCTION_ERROR__INSUFFICIENT_FUNDS,
SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_ESTIMATE_COMPUTE_LIMIT,
SolanaError,
} from '@solana/errors';
import { AccountRole } from '@solana/instructions';
import { Rpc, SimulateTransactionApi } from '@solana/rpc';
import { Blockhash } from '@solana/rpc-types';
import { ITransactionMessageWithFeePayer, Nonce, TransactionMessage } from '@solana/transaction-messages';

import { getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT } from '../compute-limit-internal';

const FOREVER_PROMISE = new Promise(() => {
/* never resolve */
});

const MOCK_BLOCKHASH_LIFETIME_CONSTRAINT = {
blockhash: 'GNtuHnNyW68wviopST3ki37Afv7LPphxfSwiHAkX5Q9H' as Blockhash,
lastValidBlockHeight: 0n,
} as const;

describe('getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT', () => {
let sendSimulateTransactionRequest: jest.Mock;
let mockTransactionMessage: ITransactionMessageWithFeePayer & TransactionMessage;
let rpc: Rpc<SimulateTransactionApi>;
let simulateTransaction: jest.Mock;
beforeEach(() => {
mockTransactionMessage = {
feePayer: '7U8VWgTUucttJPt5Bbkt48WknWqRGBfstBt8qqLHnfPT' as Address,
instructions: [],
version: 0,
};
sendSimulateTransactionRequest = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(FOREVER_PROMISE);
simulateTransaction = jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ send: sendSimulateTransactionRequest });
rpc = {
simulateTransaction,
};
});
it('aborts the `simulateTransaction` request when aborted', () => {
const abortController = new AbortController();
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
abortSignal: abortController.signal,
rpc,
transactionMessage: {
...mockTransactionMessage,
lifetimeConstraint: MOCK_BLOCKHASH_LIFETIME_CONSTRAINT,
},
});
expect(sendSimulateTransactionRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
abortSignal: expect.objectContaining({ aborted: false }),
});
abortController.abort();
expect(sendSimulateTransactionRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
abortSignal: expect.objectContaining({ aborted: true }),
});
});
it('passes the expected basic input to the simulation request', () => {
const transactionMessage = {
...mockTransactionMessage,
lifetimeConstraint: MOCK_BLOCKHASH_LIFETIME_CONSTRAINT,
};
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
commitment: 'finalized',
minContextSlot: 42n,
rpc,
transactionMessage,
});
expect(simulateTransaction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.any(String),
expect.objectContaining({
commitment: 'finalized',
encoding: 'base64',
minContextSlot: 42n,
sigVerify: false,
}),
);
});
it('appends a set compute unit limit instruction when one does not exist', async () => {
expect.assertions(1);
await jest.isolateModulesAsync(async () => {
jest.mock('@solana/transactions');
const [
{ compileTransaction },
{ getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT },
] = await Promise.all([
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
import('@solana/transactions'),
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
import('../compute-limit-internal'),
]);
const transactionMessage = {
...mockTransactionMessage, // No `SetComputeUnitLimit` instruction
lifetimeConstraint: MOCK_BLOCKHASH_LIFETIME_CONSTRAINT,
};
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage,
});
expect(compileTransaction).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
...transactionMessage,
instructions: [
...transactionMessage.instructions,
{
data:
// prettier-ignore
new Uint8Array([
0x02, // SetComputeUnitLimit instruction inde
0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, // U32::MAX
]),
programAddress: 'ComputeBudget111111111111111111111111111111',
},
],
});
});
});
it('replaces the existing set compute unit limit instruction when one exists', async () => {
expect.assertions(1);
await jest.isolateModulesAsync(async () => {
jest.mock('@solana/transactions');
const [
{ compileTransaction },
{ getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT },
] = await Promise.all([
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
import('@solana/transactions'),
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
import('../compute-limit-internal'),
]);
const transactionMessage = {
...mockTransactionMessage,
instructions: [
{ programAddress: '4Kk4nA3F2nWHCcuyT8nR6oF7HQUQHmmzAVD5k8FQPKB2' as Address },
{
data:
// prettier-ignore
new Uint8Array([
0x02, // SetComputeUnitLimit instruction inde
0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, // ComputeUnits(u32)
]),
programAddress: 'ComputeBudget111111111111111111111111111111' as Address,
},
{ programAddress: '4Kk4nA3F2nWHCcuyT8nR6oF7HQUQHmmzAVD5k8FQPKB2' as Address },
],
lifetimeConstraint: MOCK_BLOCKHASH_LIFETIME_CONSTRAINT,
};
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage,
});
expect(compileTransaction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({
instructions: [
transactionMessage.instructions[0],
{
...transactionMessage.instructions[1],
data: new Uint8Array([0x02, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff]), // Replaced with U32::MAX
},
transactionMessage.instructions[2],
],
}),
);
});
});
it('does not ask for a replacement blockhash when the transaction message is a durable nonce transaction', () => {
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage: {
...mockTransactionMessage,
instructions: [
{
accounts: [
{
address: '7wJFRFuAE9x5Ptnz2VoBWsfecTCfuuM2sQCpECGypnTU' as Address,
role: AccountRole.WRITABLE,
},
{
address: 'SysvarRecentB1ockHashes11111111111111111111' as Address,
role: AccountRole.READONLY,
},
{
address: 'HzMoc78z1VNNf9nwD4Czt6CDYEb9LVD8KsVGP46FEmyJ' as Address,
role: AccountRole.READONLY_SIGNER,
},
],
data: new Uint8Array([4, 0, 0, 0]),
programAddress: '11111111111111111111111111111111' as Address,
},
],
lifetimeConstraint: {
nonce: 'BzAqD6382v5r1pcELoi8HWrBDV4dSL9NGemMn2JYAhxc' as Nonce,
},
},
});
expect(simulateTransaction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ replaceRecentBlockhash: false }),
);
});
it('asks for a replacement blockhash even when the transaction message has a blockhash lifetime', () => {
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage: {
...mockTransactionMessage,
lifetimeConstraint: MOCK_BLOCKHASH_LIFETIME_CONSTRAINT,
},
});
expect(simulateTransaction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ replaceRecentBlockhash: true }),
);
});
it('asks for a replacement blockhash when the transaction message has no lifetime', () => {
getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage: mockTransactionMessage,
});
expect(simulateTransaction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ replaceRecentBlockhash: true }),
);
});
it('returns the estimated compute units on success', async () => {
expect.assertions(1);
sendSimulateTransactionRequest.mockResolvedValue({ value: { unitsConsumed: 42n } });
const estimatePromise = getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage: mockTransactionMessage,
});
await expect(estimatePromise).resolves.toBe(42);
});
it('caps the estimated compute units to U32::MAX', async () => {
expect.assertions(1);
sendSimulateTransactionRequest.mockResolvedValue({ value: { unitsConsumed: 4294967295n /* U32::MAX + 1 */ } });
const estimatePromise = getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage: mockTransactionMessage,
});
await expect(estimatePromise).resolves.toBe(4294967295 /* U32::MAX */);
});
it('throws with the cause when simulation fails', async () => {
expect.assertions(1);
const simulationError = new SolanaError(SOLANA_ERROR__INSTRUCTION_ERROR__INSUFFICIENT_FUNDS, {
index: 42,
});
sendSimulateTransactionRequest.mockRejectedValue(simulationError);
const estimatePromise = getComputeUnitEstimateForTransactionMessage_INTERNAL_ONLY_DO_NOT_EXPORT({
rpc,
transactionMessage: mockTransactionMessage,
});
await expect(estimatePromise).rejects.toThrow(
new SolanaError(SOLANA_ERROR__TRANSACTION__FAILED_TO_ESTIMATE_COMPUTE_LIMIT, {
cause: simulationError,
}),
);
});
});
Loading
Loading