-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add editor assignments, permission scheme, and substantive changes #95
Conversation
Solution associated to conversation on solid-contrib/information#48
incorporate substantive-changes into editor-assignment proposal
merge github permissioning changes into editor updates
👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have written two comments inline.
👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good! I'm 👍 I'm a bit unsure how large the editorial team will be an if it might grow out of proportion, but lets just see.
This reverts commit 42c0814.
What would be great to include as well is:
|
@Mitzi-Laszlo Agree there's value in providing more context around these. Have created a new issue that we can use to track them: #104 |
Who will be responsible for moderating the implementation of this process? |
The community. It’s self-governing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot, Justin!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mentioned df05c4c#r316179594 .. leaving the response and possible action to your discretion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two suggestions not crucial
Thank you @justinwb for getting this through 🙏 |
This pull request aims to address the concerns raised across the issues and pull requests itemized below. Of particular note, it merges the branches in pulls #82 and #78, and discards #81, which was no longer necessary.
The changes proposed are the result of collaboration with many of the people involved in the issues and pulls listed. Most importantly, the issues have been discussed with @timbl directly, and the proposed approach related to editor assignments and the editorial team is his recommended solution.