Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding missing paginator when listing all stock locations #3600

Merged

Conversation

softr8
Copy link
Contributor

@softr8 softr8 commented Apr 30, 2020

Current implementation only list all stock locations limited
by the defaulted per page value, but there's no way to navigate
to multiple pages.

Checklist:

  • I have followed Pull Request guidelines
  • I have added a detailed description into each commit message
  • I have updated Guides and README accordingly to this change (if needed)
  • I have added tests to cover this change (if needed)
  • I have attached screenshots to this PR for visual changes (if needed)

@softr8 softr8 force-pushed the backend_admin_stock_location_pagination branch 3 times, most recently from 2efa3d9 to 1d45d02 Compare May 4, 2020 14:16
@aldesantis
Copy link
Member

@softr8 feel free to ping me for a review once the style violations addressed by @jarednorman have been fixed!

@softr8 softr8 force-pushed the backend_admin_stock_location_pagination branch from 1d45d02 to 3348622 Compare May 6, 2020 14:54
Current implementation only list all stock locations limited
by the defaulted per page value, but there's no way to navigate
to multiple pages.
@softr8 softr8 force-pushed the backend_admin_stock_location_pagination branch from 3348622 to ca9a589 Compare May 6, 2020 15:57
@aldesantis aldesantis requested a review from a team May 6, 2020 16:21
Copy link
Member

@kennyadsl kennyadsl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@aldesantis aldesantis merged commit c4efd0a into solidusio:master May 6, 2020
@aldesantis
Copy link
Member

Thanks @softr8!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants