-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BGP neighbor configurations are not pushed to frr when DEVICE_NEIGHBOR_METADATA is not present #4231
Comments
Pavel, please confirm if this applies to 201911 or not. |
Should be fixed by #4143 |
lguohan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 23, 2020
The one big bgp configuration template was splitted into chunks. Currently we have three types of bgp neighbor peers: general bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_NEIGHBOR table entries dynamic bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_PEER_RANGE table entries monitors bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_MONITORS table entries This PR introduces three templates for each peer type: bgp policies: represent policieas that will be applied to the bgp peer-group (ip prefix-lists, route-maps, etc) bgp peer-group: represent bgp peer group which has common configuration for the bgp peer type and uses bgp routing policy from the previous item bgp peer-group instance: represent bgp configuration, which will be used to instatiate a bgp peer-group for the bgp peer-type. Usually this one is simple, consist of the referral to the bgp peer-group, bgp peer description and bgp peer ip address. This PR redefined constant.yml file. Now this file has a setting for to use or don't use bgp_neighbor metadata. This file has more parameters for now, which are not used. They will be used in the next iteration of bgpcfgd. Currently all tests have been disabled. I'm going to create next PR with the tests right after this PR is merged. I'm going to introduce better bgpcfgd in a short time. It will include support of dynamic changes for the templates. FIX:: #4231
lguohan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2020
The one big bgp configuration template was splitted into chunks. Currently we have three types of bgp neighbor peers: general bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_NEIGHBOR table entries dynamic bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_PEER_RANGE table entries monitors bgp peers. They are represented by CONFIG_DB::BGP_MONITORS table entries This PR introduces three templates for each peer type: bgp policies: represent policieas that will be applied to the bgp peer-group (ip prefix-lists, route-maps, etc) bgp peer-group: represent bgp peer group which has common configuration for the bgp peer type and uses bgp routing policy from the previous item bgp peer-group instance: represent bgp configuration, which will be used to instatiate a bgp peer-group for the bgp peer-type. Usually this one is simple, consist of the referral to the bgp peer-group, bgp peer description and bgp peer ip address. This PR redefined constant.yml file. Now this file has a setting for to use or don't use bgp_neighbor metadata. This file has more parameters for now, which are not used. They will be used in the next iteration of bgpcfgd. Currently all tests have been disabled. I'm going to create next PR with the tests right after this PR is merged. I'm going to introduce better bgpcfgd in a short time. It will include support of dynamic changes for the templates. FIX:: #4231
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
When config_db.json does not have DEVICE_NEIGHBOR_METADATA, the BGP neighbor configurations present in config_db.json are not pushed to FRR.
The dependency on device_neighbor_metadata was introduced in this pull request
https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/pull/3694/files
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Describe the results you received:
Describe the results you expected:
Additional information you deem important (e.g. issue happens only occasionally):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: