Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images #17905

zbud-msft · 2024-01-25T21:21:47Z

Why I did it

Disable eventd at buildtime for slim images

Work item tracking

Microsoft ADO (number only):26386286

How I did it

Add flags for disabling eventd and only copy rsyslog conf files when eventd is included and not slim image

How to verify it

Manual testing

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

… support

mssonicbld · 2024-01-26T00:09:18Z

@zbud-msft PR: #17905 is conflict with MS internal repo
Please complete the following PR by pushing fix commit to sonicbld/conflict_prefix/17905-fix
https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_git/Networking-acs-buildimage/pullrequest/9420275
Then comment "/azpw ms_conflict" to rerun PR checker.

zbud-msft · 2024-01-26T18:33:39Z

/azpw ms_conflict

zbud-msft · 2024-01-26T19:31:13Z

/azpw ms_conflict

zbud-msft · 2024-01-26T20:51:19Z

/azpw ms_conflict

qiluo-msft · 2024-01-26T23:13:59Z

Makefile.work

@@ -556,6 +556,7 @@ SONIC_BUILD_INSTRUCTION :=  $(MAKE) \
                           SONIC_CONFIG_USE_NATIVE_DOCKERD_FOR_BUILD=$(SONIC_CONFIG_USE_NATIVE_DOCKERD_FOR_BUILD) \
                           SONIC_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_TELEMETRY=$(INCLUDE_SYSTEM_TELEMETRY) \
                           SONIC_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_GNMI=$(INCLUDE_SYSTEM_GNMI) \
+			   SONIC_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_EVENTD=$(INCLUDE_SYSTEM_EVENTD) \


[](http://example.com/codeflow?start=0&length=6)

Could you use spaces instead of tabs? #Closed

qiluo-msft · 2024-01-26T23:42:40Z

slave.mk

@@ -423,6 +427,7 @@ $(info "INCLUDE_MGMT_FRAMEWORK"          : "$(INCLUDE_MGMT_FRAMEWORK)")
 $(info "INCLUDE_ICCPD"                   : "$(INCLUDE_ICCPD)")
 $(info "INCLUDE_SYSTEM_TELEMETRY"        : "$(INCLUDE_SYSTEM_TELEMETRY)")
 $(info "INCLUDE_SYSTEM_GNMI"             : "$(INCLUDE_SYSTEM_GNMI)")
+$(info "INCLUDE_SYSTEM_EVENTD"             : "$(INCLUDE_SYSTEM_EVENTD)")


Could you align the columns? #Closed

qiluo-msft · 2024-01-26T23:43:02Z

dockers/docker-config-engine-bullseye/Dockerfile.j2

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ COPY ["files/readiness_probe.sh", "/usr/bin/"]
 COPY ["files/container_startup.py", "/usr/share/sonic/scripts/"]
 COPY ["00-load-omprog.conf", "/etc/rsyslog.d/"]

+
 ## Clean up


No need to change. #Closed

liushilongbuaa · 2024-01-30T08:46:05Z

/azpw ms_conflict

@zbud-msft , you need complete the PR first. Then comment.

mssonicbld · 2024-01-30T21:11:28Z

@zbud-msft PR: #17905 is conflict with MS internal repo
Please complete the following PR by pushing fix commit to sonicbld/conflict_prefix/17905-fix
https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_git/Networking-acs-buildimage/pullrequest/9420275
Then comment "/azpw ms_conflict" to rerun PR checker.

mssonicbld · 2024-01-30T21:11:28Z

@zbud-msft PR: #17905 is conflict with MS internal repo
Please complete the following PR by pushing fix commit to sonicbld/conflict_prefix/17905-fix
https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_git/Networking-acs-buildimage/pullrequest/9420275
Then comment "/azpw ms_conflict" to rerun PR checker.

zbud-msft · 2024-01-30T22:09:01Z

/azpw ms_conflict

mssonicbld · 2024-01-30T22:13:24Z

@zbud-msft PR: #17905 is conflict with MS internal repo
Please complete the following PR by pushing fix commit to sonicbld/conflict_prefix/17905-fix
https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_git/Networking-acs-buildimage/pullrequest/9444323
Then comment "/azpw ms_conflict" to rerun PR checker.

zbud-msft · 2024-01-30T22:21:50Z

/azpw ms_conflict

mssonicbld · 2024-01-31T06:27:39Z

@zbud-msft PR conflicts with 202305 branch

Disable eventd at buildtime for slim images - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:26386286 Add flags for disabling eventd and only copy rsyslog conf files when eventd is included and not slim image Manual testing

### Why I did it Disable eventd at buildtime for slim images ##### Work item tracking - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:26386286 #### How I did it Add flags for disabling eventd and only copy rsyslog conf files when eventd is included and not slim image #### How to verify it Manual testing

mssonicbld · 2024-02-02T01:22:34Z

Cherry-pick PR to 202311: #18001

### Why I did it Disable eventd at buildtime for slim images ##### Work item tracking - Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:26386286 #### How I did it Add flags for disabling eventd and only copy rsyslog conf files when eventd is included and not slim image #### How to verify it Manual testing

Why I did it The PR introduced a bug for slim image build, #17905, by which the sonic_asic_platform is missing when build docker image for slim image. [ building ] [ target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz ] /sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/cli-plugin-tests /sonic /sonic Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/j2", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 202, in main output = render_command( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 186, in render_command result = renderer.render(args.template, context) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 85, in render return self._env \ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1090, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 832, in handle_exception reraise(*rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/_compat.py", line 28, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/Dockerfile.j2", line 48, in top-level template code {% if build_reduce_image_size != "y" or sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" %} jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'sonic_asic_platform' is undefined make: *** [slave.mk:1072: target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ finished ] [ target/docker-swss-layer-bullseye.gz ] [ finished ] [ target/docker-syncd-brcm-dnx.gz ] make[1]: *** [Makefile.work:608: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/data/work/1/s' make: *** [Makefile:41: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 And why it slipped the PR test? PR test doesn't compile with slim option, it won't check sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" for PR build. Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (number only): How I did it Export sonic_asic_platform for docker build in slave.mk How to verify it build with slim image option.

Why I did it The PR introduced a bug for slim image build, sonic-net#17905, by which the sonic_asic_platform is missing when build docker image for slim image. [ building ] [ target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz ] /sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/cli-plugin-tests /sonic /sonic Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/j2", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 202, in main output = render_command( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 186, in render_command result = renderer.render(args.template, context) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 85, in render return self._env \ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1090, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 832, in handle_exception reraise(*rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/_compat.py", line 28, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/Dockerfile.j2", line 48, in top-level template code {% if build_reduce_image_size != "y" or sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" %} jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'sonic_asic_platform' is undefined make: *** [slave.mk:1072: target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ finished ] [ target/docker-swss-layer-bullseye.gz ] [ finished ] [ target/docker-syncd-brcm-dnx.gz ] make[1]: *** [Makefile.work:608: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/data/work/1/s' make: *** [Makefile:41: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 And why it slipped the PR test? PR test doesn't compile with slim option, it won't check sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" for PR build. Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (number only): How I did it Export sonic_asic_platform for docker build in slave.mk How to verify it build with slim image option.

Why I did it The PR introduced a bug for slim image build, #17905, by which the sonic_asic_platform is missing when build docker image for slim image. [ building ] [ target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz ] /sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/cli-plugin-tests /sonic /sonic Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/j2", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 202, in main output = render_command( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 186, in render_command result = renderer.render(args.template, context) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 85, in render return self._env \ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1090, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 832, in handle_exception reraise(*rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/_compat.py", line 28, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/Dockerfile.j2", line 48, in top-level template code {% if build_reduce_image_size != "y" or sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" %} jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'sonic_asic_platform' is undefined make: *** [slave.mk:1072: target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ finished ] [ target/docker-swss-layer-bullseye.gz ] [ finished ] [ target/docker-syncd-brcm-dnx.gz ] make[1]: *** [Makefile.work:608: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/data/work/1/s' make: *** [Makefile:41: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 And why it slipped the PR test? PR test doesn't compile with slim option, it won't check sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" for PR build. Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (number only): How I did it Export sonic_asic_platform for docker build in slave.mk How to verify it build with slim image option.

Why I did it The PR introduced a bug for slim image build, sonic-net#17905, by which the sonic_asic_platform is missing when build docker image for slim image. [ building ] [ target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz ] /sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/cli-plugin-tests /sonic /sonic Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/j2", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 202, in main output = render_command( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 186, in render_command result = renderer.render(args.template, context) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 85, in render return self._env \ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1090, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 832, in handle_exception reraise(*rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/_compat.py", line 28, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/Dockerfile.j2", line 48, in top-level template code {% if build_reduce_image_size != "y" or sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" %} jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'sonic_asic_platform' is undefined make: *** [slave.mk:1072: target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ finished ] [ target/docker-swss-layer-bullseye.gz ] [ finished ] [ target/docker-syncd-brcm-dnx.gz ] make[1]: *** [Makefile.work:608: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/data/work/1/s' make: *** [Makefile:41: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 And why it slipped the PR test? PR test doesn't compile with slim option, it won't check sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" for PR build. Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (number only): How I did it Export sonic_asic_platform for docker build in slave.mk How to verify it build with slim image option.

Why I did it The PR introduced a bug for slim image build, #17905, by which the sonic_asic_platform is missing when build docker image for slim image. [ building ] [ target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz ] /sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/cli-plugin-tests /sonic /sonic Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/j2", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 202, in main output = render_command( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 186, in render_command result = renderer.render(args.template, context) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 85, in render return self._env \ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1090, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 832, in handle_exception reraise(*rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/_compat.py", line 28, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/Dockerfile.j2", line 48, in top-level template code {% if build_reduce_image_size != "y" or sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" %} jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'sonic_asic_platform' is undefined make: *** [slave.mk:1072: target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ finished ] [ target/docker-swss-layer-bullseye.gz ] [ finished ] [ target/docker-syncd-brcm-dnx.gz ] make[1]: *** [Makefile.work:608: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/data/work/1/s' make: *** [Makefile:41: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 And why it slipped the PR test? PR test doesn't compile with slim option, it won't check sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" for PR build. Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (number only): How I did it Export sonic_asic_platform for docker build in slave.mk How to verify it build with slim image option. Co-authored-by: StormLiangMS <89824293+StormLiangMS@users.noreply.github.com>

Why I did it The PR introduced a bug for slim image build, sonic-net#17905, by which the sonic_asic_platform is missing when build docker image for slim image. [ building ] [ target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz ] /sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/cli-plugin-tests /sonic /sonic Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/j2", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 202, in main output = render_command( File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 186, in render_command result = renderer.render(args.template, context) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/j2cli/cli.py", line 85, in render return self._env \ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1090, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 832, in handle_exception reraise(*rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/_compat.py", line 28, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/sonic/dockers/docker-dhcp-relay/Dockerfile.j2", line 48, in top-level template code {% if build_reduce_image_size != "y" or sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" %} jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'sonic_asic_platform' is undefined make: *** [slave.mk:1072: target/docker-dhcp-relay.gz] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ finished ] [ target/docker-swss-layer-bullseye.gz ] [ finished ] [ target/docker-syncd-brcm-dnx.gz ] make[1]: *** [Makefile.work:608: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/data/work/1/s' make: *** [Makefile:41: target/sonic-broadcom.bin] Error 2 And why it slipped the PR test? PR test doesn't compile with slim option, it won't check sonic_asic_platform != "broadcom" for PR build. Work item tracking Microsoft ADO (number only): How I did it Export sonic_asic_platform for docker build in slave.mk How to verify it build with slim image option.

What is the motivation for this PR? Many cases failed during teardown due to loganalyzer with below FRR related error messages. The failure only happen on the device which runs slim image. bgp#zebra[36]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 10: no fpm use-next-hop-groups bgp#zebra[36]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 12: fpm address 127.0.0.1 ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [MVZKX-EG443][EC 33554452] bgp_process_packet: BGP OPEN receipt failed for peer: XXX ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[50]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[49]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[49]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#zebra[36]: [WVJCK-PPMGD][EC 4043309093] netlink-dp (NS 0) error: No route to host, type=RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=95412, pid=3576249171 ERR bgp#bgpd[65]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#zebra[36]: [WVJCK-PPMGD][EC 4043309093] netlink-dp (NS 0) error: No route to host, type=RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=95495, pid=3576249171 ERR bgp#bgpd[65]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[65]: [XETTR-D5MR0][EC 100663316] Attempting to process an I/O event but for fd: 66(8) no thread to handle this! ERR bgp#bgpd[53]: [H4B4J-DCW2R][EC 33554455] XXX [Error] bgp_read_packet error: Connection reset by peer ERR bgp#zebra[62]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 10: no fpm use-next-hop-groups ERR bgp#zebra[62]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 12: fpm address 127.0.0.1 ERR bgp#zebra[62]: [RFREB-PAV4B][EC 100663299] vty_read: read error on vty client fd 26, closing: Connection reset by peer ERR bgp#zebra[36]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 10: no fpm use-next-hop-groups ERR bgp#zebra[36]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 12: fpm address 127.0.0.1 ERR bgp#bgpd[51]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[49]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#bgpd[51]: [VCGF0-X62M1][EC 100663301] INTERFACE_STATE: Cannot find IF PortChannel999 in VRF 0 ERR bgp#bgpd[51]: [VCGF0-X62M1][EC 100663301] INTERFACE_STATE: Cannot find IF PortChannel999 in VRF 0 ERR bgp#bgpd[48]: [P3GYW-PBKQG][EC 33554466] XXX [FSM] unexpected packet received in state OpenSent ERR bgp#zebra[36]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 10: no fpm use-next-hop-groups ERR bgp#zebra[36]: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 12: fpm address 127.0.0.1 How did you do it? Slim image's rsyslog config has been modified by sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#17905 by mistake. So the FRR error message would output into syslog and cause teardown failure. Created a github issue sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#19047 to track the issue and ignore these related error message until the issue fixed to make the nightly build more stable. r, ".* ERR bgp#bgpd.* unexpected packet received in state OpenSent" r, ".* ERR bgp#bgpd.* INTERFACE_STATE: Cannot find IF .*" r, ".* ERR bgp#bgpd.* bgp_process_packet: BGP OPEN receipt failed for peer.*" r, ".* ERR bgp#bgpd.* bgp_read_packet error: Connection reset by peer.*" r, ".* ERR bgp#bgpd.* Attempting to process an I/O event but for fd.*" r, ".* ERR bgp#zebra.* No such command on config line .*" r, ".* ERR bgp#zebra.* error: No route to host.*" r, ".* ERR bgp#zebra.* read error on vty client fd .*" How did you verify/test it? NA Any platform specific information?

zbud-msft added 5 commits January 25, 2024 01:56

Initial commit

72d8848

Second commit

ddbb30a

Merge branch 'master' into disable_eventd_slim

ac4e1f5

Add check for eventd enabled and slim image before add rsyslog plugin…

9a1f10e

… support

Remove logic from all bullseye containers

63c41ad

zbud-msft added 2 commits January 26, 2024 06:21

Use INCLUDE_SYSTEM_EVENTD flag

7106a66

Use INCLUDE_SYSTEM_EVENTD flag

1f246ef

zbud-msft marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2024 20:48

zbud-msft requested review from qiluo-msft, xumia and lguohan as code owners January 26, 2024 20:48

zbud-msft removed request for lguohan and xumia January 26, 2024 20:53

qiluo-msft reviewed Jan 26, 2024

View reviewed changes

Fix peer review comments and add buildtime config to 00-sonic.conf

d1680ba

zbud-msft requested a review from qiluo-msft January 30, 2024 20:52

Add slim image check to 00-sonic-conf.j2

4757387

qiluo-msft approved these changes Jan 30, 2024

View reviewed changes

zbud-msft added the Request for 202311 Branch label Jan 31, 2024

qiluo-msft merged commit c8439cd into sonic-net:master Jan 31, 2024
21 checks passed

StormLiangMS added the Approved for 202305 Branch label Jan 31, 2024

mssonicbld added the Cherry Pick Conflict_202305 label Jan 31, 2024

zbud-msft mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2024

Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images in 202305 #17972

Merged

11 tasks

yxieca added the Approved for 202311 Branch label Feb 2, 2024

mssonicbld mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2024

[action] [PR:17905] Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images (#17905) #18001

Merged

mssonicbld added the Created PR to 202311 Branch label Feb 2, 2024

StormLiangMS mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2024

Fix the compile issue for slim image #18015

Merged

12 tasks

mssonicbld mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2024

[action] [PR:18015] fix the compile issue for slim image (#18015) #18028

Merged

mssonicbld mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2024

[action] [PR:18015] fix the compile issue for slim image (#18015) #18057

Merged

yxieca added Included in 202311 Branch and removed Approved for 202311 Branch Created PR to 202311 Branch labels Feb 16, 2024

StormLiangMS added the Included in 202305 Branch label Feb 24, 2024

lipxu mentioned this pull request May 22, 2024

ignore FRR error messages on 202311 branch sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#12916

Merged

8 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images #17905

Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images #17905

zbud-msft commented Jan 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mssonicbld commented Jan 26, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 26, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 26, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 26, 2024

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

zbud-msft Jan 30, 2024

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

zbud-msft Jan 30, 2024

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

zbud-msft Jan 30, 2024

liushilongbuaa commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 30, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 30, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 31, 2024

mssonicbld commented Feb 2, 2024

Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images #17905

Disable eventd and rsyslog plugin in slim images #17905

Conversation

zbud-msft commented Jan 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Why I did it

Work item tracking

How I did it

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

mssonicbld commented Jan 26, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 26, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 26, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 26, 2024

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

zbud-msft Jan 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

zbud-msft Jan 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

zbud-msft Jan 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

liushilongbuaa commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 30, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 30, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 30, 2024

mssonicbld commented Jan 31, 2024

mssonicbld commented Feb 2, 2024

zbud-msft commented Jan 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

qiluo-msft Jan 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading