Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MultiDB] daemon base should use multiDB DBConnector #4549

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 8, 2020

Conversation

dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator

@dzhangalibaba dzhangalibaba commented May 6, 2020

Signed-off-by: Dong Zhang d.zhang@alibaba-inc.com

@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dzhangalibaba commented May 6, 2020

This PR and sonic-net/sonic-platform-daemons#57 depends on each other, the submodule needs updated to sonic-net/sonic-platform-daemons#57 with the merge of this PR together.

@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@qiluo-msft

qiluo-msft
qiluo-msft previously approved these changes May 6, 2020
@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

retest mellanox please

@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

retest mellanox please

@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

retest vsimage please

@dzhangalibaba
Copy link
Collaborator Author

retest mellanox please

@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft merged commit 7525fea into sonic-net:master Jun 8, 2020
@dzhangalibaba dzhangalibaba deleted the daemon branch June 9, 2020 06:41
abdosi added a commit to abdosi/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
a) we should use get_platform() with new sonic_py-common package
b) In 201911 DB Connector is still using db id based constructor
as following PR sonic-net#4549
is not cherry-picked yet. So revert the change to use db is insatead of
db_name for now.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
abdosi added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
a) we should use get_platform() with new sonic_py-common package
b) In 201911 DB Connector is still using db id based constructor
as following PR #4549
is not cherry-picked yet. So revert the change to use db is insatead of
db_name for now.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants