Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BRCM SAI 4.3.0.10-5 : Fix for ACL entry set attribute for IN_PORTS f… #6718

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2021
Merged

BRCM SAI 4.3.0.10-5 : Fix for ACL entry set attribute for IN_PORTS f… #6718

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2021

Conversation

vmittal-msft
Copy link
Contributor

…or TD3

- Why I did it
ACL entry set attribute updates all the entries in the table. The correct behavior is to set the attribute on single entry.
- How I did it
Current SDK code, while setting the new attribute, is going through all the entries and updating it. Added a logic to check for requested entry and only allow for that ACL entry.
A case has filed with BRCM. Once an official fix is provided by BRCM, we will then remove this in house fix and apply the official fix.
- How to verify it
Try setting the attribute on single ACL entry on TD3 platform a nd it should updated that attribute for requested entry only.
- Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012

- Description for the changelog

Fix for ACL entry set attribute for MATCH_IN_PORTS

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@lguohan lguohan merged commit 1d99d14 into sonic-net:master Feb 8, 2021
daall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
… IN_PORTS for TD3 (#6718)

ACL entry set attribute updates all the entries in the table. The correct behavior is to set the attribute on single entry.

- How I did it
Current SDK code, while setting the new attribute, is going through all the entries and updating it. Added a logic to check for requested entry and only allow for that ACL entry.
A case has filed with BRCM. Once an official fix is provided by BRCM, we will then remove this in house fix and apply the official fix.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants