[t0 t1 test merge] migrate ECN multidiut #16866
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/31217327-merge-multidut-ecn
branch
from
ffd7fba to
f1dfbc7
Compare
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/31217327-merge-multidut-ecn
branch
from
f1dfbc7 to
cb84bde
Compare
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 10, 2025
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/31217327-merge-multidut-ecn
branch
from
cb84bde to
002097c
Compare
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
T0 test result: MSFT access only |
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/31217327-merge-multidut-ecn
branch
from
002097c to
70f5af7
Compare
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
auspham
commented
Feb 13, 2025
tests/conftest.py
Outdated
| executor.submit(config_reload, duthost, wait_before_force_reload=300, safe_reload=True, | ||
| check_intf_up_ports=True, wait_for_bgp=True) | ||
| check_intf_up_ports=True, wait_for_bgp=wait_for_bgp) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In here we dont want to wait_for_bgp if we specified that we skip sanity.
|
MSFT only tests: https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/67ad53046f7ee067ea75ff08 I also find that the failure cases also fail in legacy code. |
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 13, 2025
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
auspham
force-pushed
the
austinpham/31217327-merge-multidut-ecn
branch
from
70f5af7 to
dbe7cfe
Compare
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
developfast
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2025
sdszhang
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2025
|
@auspham PR conflicts with 202411 branch |
11 tasks
yejianquan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Address conflict for #16866 Fixes # (issue) Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
nissampa
pushed a commit
to nissampa/sonic-mgmt_dpu_test
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2025
Description of PR Summary: As part of test merge plan, we're merging tests/snappi_tests/multidut to tests/snappi_tests for ECN folder. This PR simply moving over the same code in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn to tests/snappi_tests/ecn as it and resolve a few conflicts. Fixes # (issue) 31217327 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Described above. How did you do it? All the tests in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn folder are ran nightly on t0 to verify the status Compare each file in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn folder with tests/snappi_tests/ecn folder to find the differences Resolve the differences and modify so that it fits with t0 platform Ran regression on t0 platforms and verify if it works How did you verify/test it? We run regression on T0 platform and T2 platforms to verify if this works. Verification includes 2 main process Nightly verification trigger on before-merge branch multidut for regression Verification trigger on original tests/snappi_tests/ecn folder for baseline comparison Verification trigger on after-merge branch to compare new process. Only failures existed in baseline are acceptable. Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
nnelluri-cisco
pushed a commit
to nnelluri-cisco/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2025
Description of PR Summary: As part of test merge plan, we're merging tests/snappi_tests/multidut to tests/snappi_tests for ECN folder. This PR simply moving over the same code in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn to tests/snappi_tests/ecn as it and resolve a few conflicts. Fixes # (issue) 31217327 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Described above. How did you do it? All the tests in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn folder are ran nightly on t0 to verify the status Compare each file in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn folder with tests/snappi_tests/ecn folder to find the differences Resolve the differences and modify so that it fits with t0 platform Ran regression on t0 platforms and verify if it works How did you verify/test it? We run regression on T0 platform and T2 platforms to verify if this works. Verification includes 2 main process Nightly verification trigger on before-merge branch multidut for regression Verification trigger on original tests/snappi_tests/ecn folder for baseline comparison Verification trigger on after-merge branch to compare new process. Only failures existed in baseline are acceptable. Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
zhixzhu
pushed a commit
to zhixzhu/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2025
…/16866-fix Fixes # (issue) sonic-net#16866 cherrypick https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/pull/16866/commits
10 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
As part of test merge plan, we're merging tests/snappi_tests/multidut to tests/snappi_tests for ECN folder.
This PR simply moving over the same code in tests/snappi_tests/multidut/ecn to tests/snappi_tests/ecn as it and resolve a few conflicts.
Fixes # (issue) 31217327
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Described above.
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
We run regression on T0 platform and T2 platforms to verify if this works. Verification includes 2 main process
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation