Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[crm] Fix issues in static_route test case #3740
[crm] Fix issues in static_route test case #3740
Changes from all commits
b7df5d6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this part does the neighbor resolution? If so, we probably need to avoid it since the automatic neighbor resolution is part of the static route feature, we need to check that. I think the current failures of the test come from two aspects: 1. the arp_update script has a period of 300 seconds, whereas the config reload waiting time is shorter than that; 2. according to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#4930 the arp_update some times fails.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it is to fill the FDB entry for all interfaces on the DUT to avoid flooding unknown unicast packets. I think we may not need this changes anymore if we can wait until arp_update script is finished.