Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BFD with Static Route - Automation #9578

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

BFD with Static Route - Automation #9578

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

harsgoll
Copy link
Contributor

@harsgoll harsgoll commented Aug 21, 2023

Description of PR

  • This PR adds automation for below 2 test cases
  • Test case 1 - To verify deletion of BFD session between two line cards.
  • Test case 2 - To flap the BFD session ( Up <--> Down <---> Up) between linecards for 100 times.

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Verified on T2 Q100 testbed (internal to cisco)

Any platform specific information?

Supports Q100, Q200

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

T2

Documentation

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Aug 21, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@wangxin wangxin requested a review from siqbal1986 August 28, 2023 06:57
Copy link
Collaborator

@wangxin wangxin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@harsgoll This PR is to add new test scripts to 202205 branch.
Generally, changes should be committed to master branch firstly. If it is required by older branches, we can then back port it.
Another thing is that new tests should go to master branch only.
Only bug fixes should be back ported.

@harsgoll harsgoll closed this by deleting the head repository Aug 28, 2023
@harsgoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wangxin : Sure. Raised #9714 to get these changes into master. Closing this pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants