Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[component] add auto_update_firmware() to support the auto update. #106

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 26, 2021
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions sonic_platform_base/component_base.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -103,3 +103,35 @@ def update_firmware(self, image_path):
RuntimeError: update failed
"""
raise NotImplementedError

def auto_update_firmware(self, image_path, boot_type):
"""
Updates firmware of the component

This API performs firmware update automatically based on boot_type: it assumes firmware installation
and/or creating a loading task during the reboot, if needed, in a single call.
In case platform component requires some extra steps (apart from calling Low Level Utility)
to load the installed firmware (e.g, reboot, power cycle, etc.) - this will be done automatically during the reboot.
The loading task will be created by API.

Args:
image_path: A string, path to firmware image

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image_path : can it be mentioned that the firmware_image be a self extracting binary..

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got clarification from HLD.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This API will have any return values? Please mention if required.

boot_type: A string, reboot type following the upgrade
- none/fast/warm/cold

Returns:
Output: A return code
return_code: An integer number, status of component firmware auto-update
- return code of a positive number indicates successful auto-update
- status_installed = 1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sujinmkang IMHO, status installed is not relevant for this flow, since it requires some additional steps from user (e.g., power cycle for CPLD/FPGA, etc.), thus such an operation can't be claimed as automatic firmware upgrade.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nazariig This has been discussed several time. auto-update is expected to be able to perform install/ update/ creating a task for the components firmware update if the update is available for the boot_type.
The decision should be done by the platform api.
For example, with cold boot, cpld firmware update can be done if the reboot plugin can handle the powercycle flag to complete the cpld firmware update. For warm/fast reboot, the cpld firmware update won't happen and the platform api will return boot_type error? fwutil will not exit for the boot_type error since the firmware auto-update is not just supported in that boot_type case.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For warm/fast reboot, the cpld firmware update won't happen and the platform api will return boot_type error? fwutil will not exit for the boot_type error since the firmware auto-update is not just supported in that boot_type case.

@sujinmkang that is clear, but i am talking about the case when we have status_installed.
What is the use case for this status code? Basically this means that user still needs to do some manual steps to finish firmware upgrade and this is something completely different to what we call automatic.

- status_updated = 2
- status_scheduled = 3
- return_code of a negative number indicates failed auto-update
- status_err_boot_type = -1
- status_err_image = -2
- status_err_others = -3
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sujinmkang maybe it's better to use err_unknown?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nazariig please review this PR again.


Raises:
RuntimeError: auto-update failure cause
"""
raise NotImplementedError