Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[portmgrd/portsyncd] Refactor code so that portsyncd does not deal with configurations at run time #1085

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zhenggen-xu
Copy link
Collaborator

Refactor code so that portsyncd does not deal with configurations at run time

portmgrd will deal with configurations for both linux side and appDB.
Added vs test cases for port config changes

Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu zxu@linkedin.com

What I did
Refactor code so that portsyncd does not deal with configurations at run time
portmgrd will deal with configurations for both linux side and appDB.
Added vs test cases for port config changes

Why I did it
Only one daemon is handling port configurations from cfg_db to app-db/linux.

How I verified it
vs test cases

Details if related
-- Initial configurations is not moved yet.
-- port_config.ini dependencies is not removed yet.

@zhenggen-xu zhenggen-xu force-pushed the port-refactor-up branch 2 times, most recently from 8c9eac6 to cd58f8c Compare October 8, 2019 05:42
…run time

portmgrd will deal with configurations for both linux side and appDB.
Added vs test cases for port config changes

Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <zxu@linkedin.com>
@zhenggen-xu zhenggen-xu changed the title Refactor code so that portsyncd does not deal with configurations at run time [portmgrd/portsyncd] Refactor code so that portsyncd does not deal with configurations at run time Oct 24, 2019
@zhenggen-xu zhenggen-xu marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2019 03:40
@qiluo-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Please resolve the conflict first

@prsunny
Copy link
Collaborator

prsunny commented Feb 8, 2020

@zhenggen-xu , is this an enhancement or you encountered any issue with current model?

EdenGri pushed a commit to EdenGri/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2022
Signed-off-by: Neetha John <nejo@microsoft.com>
oleksandrivantsiv pushed a commit to oleksandrivantsiv/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
* [asan] suppress the static variable leaks

This is to suppress ASAN false positives for static variables.
For example, the ServiceMethodTable::m_slots is sometimes reported as
leaked.

Signed-off-by: Yakiv Huryk <yhuryk@nvidia.com>

* [asan] add missing SWSS_LOG_ENTER()

Signed-off-by: Yakiv Huryk <yhuryk@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants