Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[202111] [portchannel] Added ACL/PBH binding checks to the port before getting added to portchannel #2186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2022

Conversation

vivekrnv
Copy link
Contributor

@vivekrnv vivekrnv commented May 26, 2022

Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri vkarri@nvidia.com

What I did

Backport #2151 to 202111
The change to handle it in oA is already added.

When this check is not performed when adding the config, the portchannel configuration will be inconsistent b/w Kernel and ASIC

How I did it

Utilize the match infra to implement methods to check for ACL/PBH bindings to a port

How to verify it

Unit tests

Previous command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)

New command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)

Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri <vkarri@nvidia.com>
@liat-grozovik liat-grozovik merged commit 85595c8 into sonic-net:202111 May 26, 2022
dbarashinvd pushed a commit to dbarashinvd/sonic-utilities that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2022
…e getting added to portchannel (sonic-net#2186)

- What I did
Backport sonic-net#2151 to 202111
The change to handle it in oA is already added.

When this check is not performed when adding the config, the portchannel configuration will be inconsistent b/w Kernel and ASIC

- How I did it
Utilize the match infra to implement methods to check for ACL/PBH bindings to a port

- How to verify it
Unit tests

Signed-off-by: Vivek Reddy Karri <vkarri@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants