Pure-Rust boot sequence #74
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
so it doesn't conflict with the 32-bit kernel target when we write that
moves code from 05d24c8 into this branch
so it doesn't conflict with the 32-bit kernel target when we write that
moves code from 05d24c8 into this branch
everything works except for the final far jump to `arch_init`. also, messy
it makes it past the jump to long mode now but appears to make a page fault when unpacking the multiboot info. i suspect the multiboot addr is being passed wrongly...
holy crap you guys i fixed it
yay zero-cost abstractions. rust is cool!
this was added by mistake in the rebase
hawkw
added
kind/feature
|
Ah, never mind - travis build needs to be fixed, still. |
|
Looks like we're good to go! 🎊 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the pure-Rust boot sequence for x86_64.
This closes #17, closes #67, closes #68, closes #69, and closes #70.
There is now a page fault when we try to set up the kernel heap, but this is likely because we are trying to create the heap before we've remapped the kernel into the higher address space. Since this is already slated to be more or less completely rewritten anyway (see #73 and so on), I think we can go ahead and merge this.