Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow exago to use hiop@develop past v1.0.1 #41384

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2023

Conversation

jaelynlitz
Copy link
Contributor

Adjust the spack package to confine previous exago releases to hiop@1.0.0 and move future versions to v1.0.1 onwards.
Adjust petsc version numbers.

Copy link

spackbot-app bot commented Dec 1, 2023

@ryandanehy can you review this PR?

This PR modifies the following package(s), for which you are listed as a maintainer:

  • exago

Copy link
Contributor

@cameronrutherford cameronrutherford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small change to revert

@@ -160,7 +161,7 @@ class Exago(CMakePackage, CudaPackage, ROCmPackage):
depends_on("petsc@3.13:3.14", when="@:1.2")
depends_on("petsc@3.16", when="@1.3:1.4")
depends_on("petsc@3.18:3.19", when="@1.5")
depends_on("petsc@3.20:", when="@1.6:")
depends_on("petsc@3.19:", when="@1.6:")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@balay added this. I think it's safer just to use 3.20+ and move on from 3.19

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm - looking at my prior change at dbf21bf

Looks like petsc@3.20 was not in the dependency list - so my change added it in.

If petsc@3.19 works with @1.6 - its fine to add in this additional change.

Copy link
Contributor

@ryandanehy ryandanehy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming the slight change is made this looks good.

@balay balay merged commit 88e738c into spack:develop Dec 2, 2023
11 checks passed
RikkiButler20 pushed a commit to RikkiButler20/spack that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants