test: let's add coverage for the doctype rename workaround

I want to make sure that we don't break the thing we're asking Sanitize to do; and I want to make sure we have valgrind coverage for it. See rgrove/sanitize#238 for context.
sparklemotion · Jun 12, 2024 · 7b713b9 · 7b713b9
1 parent 272b45c
commit 7b713b9
Showing 1 changed file with 15 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/test/xml/test_document.rb b/test/xml/test_document.rb
@@ -264,6 +264,21 @@ def test_create_internal_subset
  assert_equal("staff.dtd", ss.system_id)
  end
 
+ def test_replacing_internal_subset
+ # see https://github.com/rgrove/sanitize/pull/238
+ skip_unless_libxml2("JRuby impl does not support unlinking the internal subset, it probably should")
+
+ document = Nokogiri::HTML5::Document.parse("<!DOCTYPE foo><html><div>hello</div></html>")
+
+ assert_equal("foo", document.internal_subset.name)
+
+ document.internal_subset.unlink
+ document.create_internal_subset("bar", nil, nil)
+
+ assert_equal("bar", document.internal_subset.name)
+ assert_operator(document.to_html, :start_with?, "<!DOCTYPE bar>")
+ end
+
  def test_external_subset
  assert_nil(xml.external_subset)
  xml = Dir.chdir(ASSETS_DIR) do