Use same syntax highlighting elements as tabatkins/highlighter #1313
Comments
domenic
added a commit
to whatwg/whatwg.org
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2018
We accidentally broke it in speced/bikeshed@7a022f4, thinking the block added in #209 would suffice, but due to speced/bikeshed#1313 it does not work yet. While waiting for speced/bikeshed#1313 to be fixed, include these styles, to un-break syntax highlighting.
domenic
added a commit
to whatwg/whatwg.org
that referenced
this issue
Jul 23, 2018
We accidentally broke it in speced/bikeshed@7a022f4, thinking the block added in #209 would suffice, but due to speced/bikeshed#1313 it does not work yet. While waiting for speced/bikeshed#1313 to be fixed, include these styles, to un-break syntax highlighting.
TimvdLippe
added a commit
to TimvdLippe/whatwg.org
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2018
speced/bikeshed#1313 has been resolved, thus the styles can once again be removed. They were introduced in whatwg#214
domenic
pushed a commit
to whatwg/whatwg.org
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2018
speced/bikeshed#1313 has been resolved, thus the styles can once again be removed. They were introduced in #214.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In 7a022f4 we removed syntax highlighting inline styles from WHATWG specs under the assumption that https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org/pull/209/files would suffice. However, it appears Bikeshed-produced specs don't use the special custom elements/attributes that tabatkins/highlighter does. So, right now all WHATWG specs are missing highlighting -_-.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: