Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pattern category for ABNF, Regex, etc. #85

Closed
spenserblack opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #492
Closed

Pattern category for ABNF, Regex, etc. #85

spenserblack opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #492
Milestone

Comments

@spenserblack
Copy link
Owner

spenserblack commented Aug 21, 2023

See #72

Regex and ABNF both fall under "data," but this isn't necessarily accurate. Perhaps "grammar" or "pattern" makes the most sense as a category?

@spenserblack spenserblack added this to the v1 milestone Aug 22, 2023
@jake-87
Copy link
Contributor

jake-87 commented Aug 29, 2023

My two cents is that "Grammar" makes the most sense, as they're both specifying a "set of things that can be matched". This probably wouldn't be super familiar to your layperson, though, so I don't think "Pattern" would be that bad either.

@spenserblack
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks for the input! I do like "grammar" myself. If/when this project gets sufficient usage, perhaps I'll put out a poll.

@spenserblack spenserblack moved this to Triage in Gengo Sep 12, 2023
@spenserblack spenserblack changed the title New category for ABNF, Regex, etc. Pattern category for ABNF, Regex, etc. Jan 8, 2025
@spenserblack spenserblack moved this from Triage to Todo in Gengo Jan 8, 2025
@spenserblack spenserblack linked a pull request Jan 8, 2025 that will close this issue
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Gengo Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants