You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the long run descclassname and descname could be deprecated. Also one could debate if one should change the tags <code> and <em> to <span>, but I have no strong opinion on this.
This scheme can be extend when more complex signatures arise, as proposed in #4289. For example one could add classes sig-paramname and sig-paramvalue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Subject: Consistent and semantic CSS for signatures
I propse to introduce a consistent set of semantic CSS classes for easier styling of the signature.
Current state
Example signature:
Axes.
vlines
( x, y, linestyles='solid' )The corresponding HTML looks like this:
Proposed change
Use this set of semantic CSS classes:
These could simply be added to maintain compatibility with existing CSS files:
In the long run
descclassname
anddescname
could be deprecated. Also one could debate if one should change the tags<code>
and<em>
to<span>
, but I have no strong opinion on this.This scheme can be extend when more complex signatures arise, as proposed in #4289. For example one could add classes
sig-paramname
andsig-paramvalue
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: