Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not require that X509 CAs minted by an upstream authority have a URI SAN #3997

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

amartinezfayo
Copy link
Member

Changed the validation in the credvalidator package to not require that X509 CAs minted by an upstream authority have a URI SAN.
When a CA certificate does have a URI SAN, other validations still apply: https://github.com/spiffe/spiffe/blob/main/standards/X509-SVID.md#32-signing-certificates

Fixes #3996.

…RI SAN

Signed-off-by: Agustín Martínez Fayó <amartinezfayo@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@azdagron azdagron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

\o/ thanks @amartinezfayo !

@amartinezfayo amartinezfayo merged commit c1c5f43 into spiffe:main Mar 21, 2023
@amartinezfayo amartinezfayo modified the milestones: 1.6.2, 1.6.3 Apr 5, 2023
Basavaraju-G pushed a commit to Basavaraju-G/spire that referenced this pull request May 3, 2023
…RI SAN (spiffe#3997)

Signed-off-by: Agustín Martínez Fayó <amartinezfayo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Basavaraju-G <basavaraju013@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not require that X509 CAs minted by an upstream authority have a URI SAN
2 participants