Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(front50): teach MonitorPipelineTask to handle missing/null execution ids #4555

Conversation

dbyron-sf
Copy link
Contributor

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

…ion ids

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).
@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf force-pushed the MonitorPipelineTask-nonexistent-execution-id branch from 5e04c9b to dc4c681 Compare October 9, 2023 22:12
Copy link
Member

@nemesisOsorio nemesisOsorio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, can we backport all the way down to 1.28?

@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf added the ready to merge Approved and ready for merge label Oct 9, 2023
@mergify mergify bot added the auto merged Merged automatically by a bot label Oct 9, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 7523f5d into spinnaker:master Oct 9, 2023
@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf deleted the MonitorPipelineTask-nonexistent-execution-id branch October 9, 2023 23:19
@dbyron-sf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio backport release-1.28.x release-1.29.x release-1.30.x release-1.32.x

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 9, 2023

backport release-1.28.x release-1.29.x release-1.30.x release-1.32.x

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555) (#4556)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)

Co-authored-by: David Byron <82477955+dbyron-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555) (#4557)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)

Co-authored-by: David Byron <82477955+dbyron-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555) (#4558)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)

Co-authored-by: David Byron <82477955+dbyron-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ion ids (#4555) (#4559)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)

Co-authored-by: David Byron <82477955+dbyron-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
@nemesisOsorio
Copy link
Member

@dbyron-sf seems like you miss backport forrelease-1.31.x, can you please create an extra backport for release-1.27.x?

@dbyron-sf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio backport release-1.27.x release-1.31.x

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 10, 2023

backport release-1.27.x release-1.31.x

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…ion ids (#4555)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…ion ids (#4555)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…ion ids (#4555) (#4561)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)

Co-authored-by: David Byron <82477955+dbyron-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…ion ids (#4555) (#4560)

give the task terminal status in this case since that feels closer to the truth than
succeeded even though the error is likely elsewhere (e.g. in a StartPipelineTask).

(cherry picked from commit 7523f5d)

Co-authored-by: David Byron <82477955+dbyron-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto merged Merged automatically by a bot ready to merge Approved and ready for merge target-release/1.33
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants