Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: adding new data models #863

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

feat: adding new data models #863

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

harshilgajera-crest
Copy link
Contributor

@harshilgajera-crest harshilgajera-crest commented Jul 8, 2024

Added new data models:

  • Compute_Inventory
  • Data_Access
  • Databases
  • Event_Signatures
  • Interprocess Messaging
  • JVM
  • Performance
  • Ticket_Management

Updated version in requirement_test_datamodel_tag_constants.py file

@harshilgajera-crest harshilgajera-crest changed the base branch from main to develop July 8, 2024 06:21
@harshilgajera-crest harshilgajera-crest changed the title Feat/add new data models feat: adding new data models Jul 8, 2024
@harshilgajera-crest harshilgajera-crest marked this pull request as ready for review July 8, 2024 08:59
@harshilgajera-crest harshilgajera-crest requested a review from a team as a code owner July 8, 2024 08:59
@artemrys artemrys merged commit 91fd95d into develop Jul 11, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@artemrys artemrys deleted the feat/add-new-data-models branch July 11, 2024 08:10
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 11, 2024
@srv-rr-github-token
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.3.0-beta.9 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@srv-rr-github-token
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.4.0-beta.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants