Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch Jersey starter to use Spring 5 module #17412

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dreis2211
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I noticed that we upgraded to Jersey 2.29 recently. That should give us the possibility to switch from jersey-spring4 to jersey-spring5. Unfortunately, the new module doesn't seem to be exposed through the BOM yet, so I added it explicitly for the time being and opened eclipse-ee4j/jersey#4184 to include this in the BOM.

Let me know what you think.
Cheers,
Christoph

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jul 2, 2019
@philwebb philwebb added for: team-attention An issue we'd like other members of the team to review type: dependency-upgrade A dependency upgrade and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jul 2, 2019
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 2.2.x milestone Jul 2, 2019
@philwebb philwebb added type: task A general task type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed for: team-attention An issue we'd like other members of the team to review type: dependency-upgrade A dependency upgrade type: task A general task labels Jul 3, 2019
@philwebb philwebb changed the title Use Spring 5 module of Jersey Switch Jersey starter to use Spring 5 module Jul 3, 2019
@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Jul 4, 2019
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 2.2.x, 2.2.0.M5 Jul 4, 2019
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

Thanks very much, @dreis2211.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants