Skip to content

Conversation

schauder
Copy link
Contributor

@schauder schauder commented Jul 22, 2021

This is rebased onto #1018, please review that first.

Closes #995

Copy link
Member

@mp911de mp911de left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding conditions turned out it a pretty small change in exchange for much more increased flexibility.

@schauder
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adding conditions turned out it a pretty small change in exchange for much more increased flexibility.

Yeah, that was a nice surprise for a change.

schauder added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
schauder added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2021
@schauder schauder force-pushed the issue/995-non-trivial-join-condition branch from 6cfa4ca to 704e54f Compare July 30, 2021 06:08
@gregturn
Copy link
Contributor

I almost need to review this after #1018 is completed, so I can see what's unique here.

@mp911de mp911de force-pushed the issue/995-non-trivial-join-condition branch from 704e54f to 391293e Compare September 28, 2021 12:28
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2021
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2021
Reformat code. Add since tag.

See #995
Original pull request: #1014.
@mp911de mp911de added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Sep 28, 2021
@mp911de mp911de self-assigned this Sep 28, 2021
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 2.3 RC1 (2021.1.0) milestone Sep 28, 2021
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Sep 28, 2021

That's merged and polished now.

@mp911de mp911de closed this Sep 28, 2021
@mp911de mp911de deleted the issue/995-non-trivial-join-condition branch September 28, 2021 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: enhancement A general enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SelectBuilder makes assumptions about join conditions being "trivial"

3 participants