Skip to content

Enable preview builds #167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
lahma opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Enable preview builds #167

lahma opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@lahma
Copy link
Collaborator

lahma commented Nov 1, 2018

We currently have Appveyor builds running. Now that there's .NET Core support in master it would be lovely to have some kind of preview builds. Microsoft has opened free Azure DevOpsCiWhatNot for OSS projects that could also handle thins.

I'm pinging @sbohlen to get some feedback. You've set the current system, who should proceed? I've set a MyGet feed ( https://www.myget.org/feed/Packages/springnet ) that could be used and I'm gladly giving you maintainer permissions if you want. I've been a little lonesome cowboy here doing the changes so all help if time permits is always welcome.

@freemansoft
Copy link

@lahma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lahma commented Nov 1, 2018

@freemansoft yep, that's the thing if it's feasible. I guess they don't have good database integration testing story yet though.

@sbohlen
Copy link
Contributor

sbohlen commented Nov 2, 2018

@lahma I'm not at all married to Appveyor per se. But that said, I also don't have any issue with them either. Is there a compelling advantage to shifting to the Azure DevOps pipeline for OSS instead of Appveyor?

As a MSFT FTE I suppose it should be embarrassing for me admit it, but I've not (yet) had occasion to do a SxS comparison of pro/con feature-by-feature between the two :)

@lahma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lahma commented Nov 2, 2018

@sbohlen The Azure DevOps was more idea to throw as an alternative or even to run on both. I don't see any reason to change for the sake of a change, Appveyor works like a charm and you did wonderful job getting it to run integration tests too - which I believe is quite hard to achieve at the moment in DevOps land.

If you happen to have the time to check what configuration would be needed for Appveyor to push the MyGet feed I would appreciate that. As you are the admin of the Appveyor project, only you can create the secrets needed. See Quartz.NET's definition here. I you would like to, I can set you as an admin for the MyGet feed, just send me your MyGet username or e-mail address you would like to use as private message (email, GitHub, tweet, whatever works).

Then the required thing would be the deploy addition to appveyor.yml with your encrypted secret, like decribed in the docs.

@rmszc81
Copy link

rmszc81 commented Mar 20, 2019

Is there any 2.0.1 package after fix no #120 ?
I had no success trying to build the source code by myself. Would you kindly guys help on it?

  • it must be this version, due to other dependencies on a legacy project.
    thanks!

@Ablu
Copy link

Ablu commented Apr 29, 2019

Is there anything that can be done to assist this?

@rmszc81
Copy link

rmszc81 commented Apr 29, 2019

@Ablu, no.

This issue was for a company project that I was working before, now it doesn't matter anymore.

I solved by cloning the repository and building the binaries through vs2010. Then I added the references to the project manually. Problem was solved and case closed

Thanks for the support anyway.

Regards,

[],

@rmszc81

@Ablu
Copy link

Ablu commented Apr 29, 2019

I meant the general task of providing preview builds :)

But I am glad that you were able to resolve your issue.

@lahma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lahma commented Aug 2, 2021

See #187 (comment)

@lahma lahma closed this as completed Aug 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants