make SP NameIDPolicy configurable in RelyingPartyRegistration

[amergey]

closes gh-9115

[jzheaux]

Thanks for the PR, @amergey! This PR seems broader than the scope of #9115, so I think we first should take a step back and make sure that we're on the same page about what support should go into the framework and where.

To start that, will you please add some detail to #9115 about your use case?

[amergey]

I have updated #9115, I am not the reporter so, I added a comment, I cannot edit the issue.

[jzheaux]

@amergey, thanks for your patience on this review. I've left some feedback inline.

Would you please update the copyright year on any edited files and also squash your commits?

We can schedule this for 5.7.0-M1.

[jzheaux]

For consistency, will you please lowercase acronyms like so: nameIdFormat. Please do the same for the associated getter and setter.

[jzheaux]

Please update @since flags to 5.7

[amergey]

I tried to made requested changes, but this PR is quite old already and I have trouble to rebase it to main, it would have been better to make these suggestions last year ....

[jzheaux]

it would have been better to make these suggestions last year ....

I'm sorry it took so long to get back to this. I corrected the rebase and this is now merged via a17dfb8456cf3a517d44cfcccdaa7a1d2ae6121f for 6.0 and dbe4d704f844d7d3a4b7048e004c07e1496033d2 for 5.7.