-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ReactiveVaultTemplate
for the key-value backend version 2
#576
Comments
Feel free to submit a pull request. We initially didn't provide any higher-level API as we waited for signals how/whether the reactive API will be used. |
Any plan on this issue? |
Working on a PR for the reactive versioned/unversioned key-value operations (I can potentially work on the other operations classes after I am done with this). Seems pretty straight forward. I am starting to collect some questions. Is this enhancement the right place to ask questions until I get a PR created? |
Great news, @tweiand. This is the right place to discuss design and questions. |
Started putting code in the Here is my current plan:
|
Thanks for the update. Please note that we've upgraded Spring Javaformat which might require a rebase on your side to avoid merge conflicts caused by an updated code format. |
Update on this: I have integration tests for the new code and they are all passing. All JSON parsing done with Left to do before requesting review:
General comments so far about the repo:
|
I plan on having a MR ready for review at the end of the week. |
Finding time to complete this. Had other priorities pop up😀 |
Still working on this, but, away from my laptop for two weeks. |
May I please get initial feedback on #807? It still needs work on the java docs and maybe some code deduplication. Wanted to get the conversation started. |
Hey all! Can I please get an initial review of #807 please? Once I have the initial feedback I can finish this up. |
I've been on vacation for the past weeks and I'll have a look in the next days. |
ReactiveVaultTemplate
for the key-value backend version 2
It would be great if
ReactiveVaultTemplate
supports KV backend v2 similar to non-reactive version.As a workaround, it's possible to use the current client and just add
data
to the path and wrap all POJO intodata
element but having built-in support would simplify v1->v2 migration.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: