-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maintenance: convert ICP HttpRequest* to smart Pointer #1804
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for this upgrade.
@@ -136,19 +136,16 @@ icp_common_t::getOpCode() const | |||
|
|||
/* ICPState */ | |||
|
|||
ICPState::ICPState(icp_common_t &aHeader, HttpRequest *aRequest): | |||
ICPState::ICPState(icp_common_t &aHeader, const HttpRequestPointer &aRequest): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you recall from previous discussions, I think we should use Foo::Pointer1 whenever that name has to be visible (for other valid reasons).
This suggestion illustrates the change but this change request applies to most other (if not all other) PR changes as well.
ICPState::ICPState(icp_common_t &aHeader, const HttpRequestPointer &aRequest): | |
ICPState::ICPState(icp_common_t &aHeader, const HttpRequest::Pointer &aRequest): |
I do not insist on these changes.
Footnotes
-
Instead of a FooPointer forward declaration. ↩
|
||
/// \ingroup ServerProtocolICPAPI | ||
bool icpAccessAllowed(Ip::Address &from, HttpRequest * icp_request); | ||
bool icpAccessAllowed(Ip::Address &, const HttpRequestPointer &); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please keep the first parameter name. It is very useful to a human reader of this declaration.
bool icpAccessAllowed(Ip::Address &, const HttpRequestPointer &); | |
bool icpAccessAllowed(Ip::Address &from, const HttpRequestPointer &); |
{ | ||
int reason = refreshCheck(entry, request, 30); | ||
int reason = refreshCheck(entry, request.getRaw(), 30); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
int reason = refreshCheck(entry, request.getRaw(), 30); | |
const auto reason = refreshCheck(entry, request.getRaw(), 30); |
++ refreshCounts[rcICP].total; | ||
++ refreshCounts[rcICP].status[reason]; | ||
return (reason < 200) ? 0 : 1; | ||
return !(reason < 200); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you are going to make this condition look different from its duplicates (in refresh.cc context), then please simplify it:
return !(reason < 200); | |
return reason >= 200; |
Alternatively, keep the original look-and-feel (until all such conditions are fixed in refresh.cc):
return !(reason < 200); | |
return (reason < 200) ? false : true; |
@@ -536,8 +529,6 @@ doV2Query(int fd, Ip::Address &from, char *buf, icp_common_t header) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
icpCreateAndSend(codeToSend, flags, url, header.reqnum, src_rtt, fd, from, state.al); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I recommend removing "Maintenance: " from PR title because these changes might (positively) affect current or future code if, for example, icpCreateAndSend() throws. I do not insist on this change.
No description provided.