legal: Replace MIT by Apache2 license #77
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #77 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.03% 85.03%
=======================================
Files 16 16
Lines 942 942
=======================================
Hits 801 801
Misses 83 83
Partials 58 58Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
LICENSE
Outdated
| same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier | ||
| identification within third-party archives. | ||
|
|
||
| Copyright {yyyy} {name of copyright owner} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shall this be replaced with proper copyright?
As per https://github.com/src-d/guide/blob/master/engineering/documents/apache/LICENSE
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh, I didn't know we had those files in the guide. We should certainly use them.
That being said, I don't think the LICENSE file is the place where that replacing should be done since:
- the description doesn't make sense if replaced.
- you're modifying a LICENSE file that should be generic.
That being said. if that's the way the LICENSE files are in our guide, I guess it's already been defined that we should use those, so I'll replace it anyway.
|
Looks great to me |
No description provided.