Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document resource limits #263

Closed
17 tasks done
Tracked by #241
fhennig opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #288
Closed
17 tasks done
Tracked by #241

document resource limits #263

fhennig opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #288
Assignees

Comments

@fhennig
Copy link
Contributor

fhennig commented Aug 31, 2022

There is a common resource in the operator-rs to configure pod resource settings. We want to have some documentation for the resources concept that can be linked from the operators. It should be similar to this page: https://docs.stackable.tech/home/stable/concepts/s3.html.

Blocking / Open questions

  • Operators use different names and amounts of PVCs. How do we want to handle this via a general concepts page?
  • Java product-based Operators e.g. calculate down the heap memory (currently 0.8 * pod memory) that will be set for the process. How do we specify this per operator (not required for python based ones)?

Acceptance

  • A new concepts page for resources is included in the documentation
  • This page shows the usage of allocating PVCs (with a hint that this must adhere to the PVCs required by the operator)
  • This page shows the utilization of memory and CPU settings
  • Optional: The relationship of pod memory and e.g. Java heap is described (not sure this belongs in a general concepts page)
  • This page is referenced by all operators using these resources (please add the Issues/PRs here)

Products

@razvan
Copy link
Member

razvan commented Oct 4, 2022

Bugfix for link to roles concept: #293

@lfrancke
Copy link
Member

lfrancke commented Oct 4, 2022

All done, thank you!

@lfrancke lfrancke closed this as completed Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants